A comparative study of choledochorraphy (primary repair) versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Surgery - Year 2018, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: T-tube drainage used to be standard practice after surgical choledochotomy, but there is now a tendency in some canters to close the common bile duct primarily with stent in situ. This study was designed to compare the clinical results of primary closure(stent in situ) with T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy and assess the safety of primary closure with stent in situ for future application. Methods: This study was conducted at surgical Unit-3, National Institute Of Medical Sciences and Research-Jaipur from July 2017 to April 2018. Twenty patients were included in this study out of which 10 underwent primary closure with stent in situ and 10 T-tube placements. Main outcome measures were operating time, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Results: The age of patients in the study ranged from 25-75 years. There were 7 male while 13 female patients. Group-1 consisted of 10 patients underwent primary closure with stent in situ after choledocotomy, while Group-2 also consisted of 10 patients underwent T-tube drainage after duct exploration. Mean hospital stay in Group-1 patients was 7.63 days while in group 2 it was 13.6 days. Overall complication rate in group 1 was 20%, biliary leakage in 1 (10%), jaundice in 1 (10%). No re-exploration was required in Group-1. In Group-2 overall complication rate was 50%, biliary leakage in 2 (20%), jaundice in 1 (10%), dislodgement of T tube in 1 (10%) and wound infection in 1 (10%) patients. Re-exploration was done in one patient. Conclusion: Primary closure with stent in situ of Common Bile Duct (CBD) is a safe and cost-effective alternative procedure to routine T-tube drainage after open choledocotomy.

Authors and Affiliations

Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Pratik J Khandal

Keywords

Related Articles

Preoperative Serum Albumin as an Independent Predictor of Post-Operative Morbidity

Background: Approximately one-third to one-half of hospitalized patients are malnourished at the time of admission, and this nutritional status can not only adversely affect a patient’s clinical condition, but adversely...

Retrospective study for Sublayhernioplasty

Ventral hernias result from defect in the abdominal wall and it’s a common surgical condition with a reported incidence of 1-15% following all laparotomies. In Sublayhernioplasty, the prosthetic mesh is placed in the pre...

A Single centre study of role of repeat CT scans in the treatment of traumatic brain injury

Background: Traditionally, nonoperative management of Traumatic brain injury patients with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has consisted of observation and a routine repeat head CT (HCT) study at 24–48 hours after admis...

A comparative study of sutures versus cynocralate glue for mesh fixation in the repair of inguinal hernia

Background: Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia, described for the first time in 1989, has become a widely accepted surgical procedure which combines safety, effectiveness and a low hernia recurrence rate Aims and Ob...

Safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided suprapubic cystolithotripsy for vesical calculi - A chart review

Background: We evaluated safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive surgical technique involving ultrasound guided supra-pubic percutaneous access with desired size amplatz sheath placement under direct- vision for...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP477708
  • DOI 10.26611/106625
  • Views 153
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Pratik J Khandal (2018). A comparative study of choledochorraphy (primary repair) versus T-tube drainage after open choledochotomy. Medpulse International Journal of Surgery, 6(2), 49-52. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-477708