A re-examination of the effect of contextual group size on people’s attitude to risk

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Using Kahneman and Tversky’s life-death decision paradigm, Wang and colleagues (e.g., Wang & Johnston, 1995; Wang, 1996a, 1996b, 1996c, 2008; Wang et al., 2001) have shown two characteristic phenomena regarding people’s attitude to risk when the contextual group size is manipulated. In both positive and negative frames, people tend to take greater risks in life-death decisions as the contextual group size becomes smaller; this risk-seeking attitude is greater when framed positively than negatively. (This second characteristic often leads to the disappearance of the framing effect in small group contexts comprising of 6 or 60 people.) Their results could shed new light on the effect of contextual group size on people’s risk choice. However these results are usually observed in laboratory experiments with university student samples. This study aims to examine the external validity of these results through different ways of experimentation and with a different sample base. The first characteristic was replicated in both a face-to-face interview with a randomly selected sample of the Japanese general public, and a web-based experiment with a non-student sample, but not the second.

Authors and Affiliations

Kazumi Shimizu and Daisuke Udagawa

Keywords

Related Articles

Tests of Cumulative Prospect Theory with graphical displays of probability

Recent research reported evidence that contradicts cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic. The same body of research also violates two editing principles of original prospect theory: cancellation (the prin...

Using cognitive models to combine probability estimates

We demonstrate the usefulness of cognitive models for combining human estimates of probabilities in two experiments. The first experiment involves people’s estimates of probabilities for general knowledge questions such...

Coherence and correspondence in the psychological analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics

Numerical predictions are of central interest for both coherence-based approaches to judgment and decisions — the Heuristic and Biases (HB) program in particular — and to correspondence-based approaches — Social Judgment...

Separating response variability from structural inconsistency to test models of risky decision making

Individual true and error theory assumes that responses by the same person to the same choice problem within a block of trials are based on the same true preferences but may show preference reversals due to random error....

Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in goal penalty shootouts

Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the o...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677787
  • DOI -
  • Views 148
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Kazumi Shimizu and Daisuke Udagawa (2011). A re-examination of the effect of contextual group size on people’s attitude to risk. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677787