Separating response variability from structural inconsistency to test models of risky decision making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2012, Vol 7, Issue 4

Abstract

Individual true and error theory assumes that responses by the same person to the same choice problem within a block of trials are based on the same true preferences but may show preference reversals due to random error. Between blocks, a person’s true preferences may differ or stay the same. This theory is illustrated with studies testing two critical properties that distinguish models of risky decision making: (1) restricted branch independence, which is implied by original prospect theory and violated in a specific way by both cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic; and (2) stochastic dominance, which is implied by cumulative prospect theory. Corrected for random error, most individuals systematically violated stochastic dominance, ruling out cumulative prospect theory. Furthermore, most people violated restricted branch independence in the opposite way predicted by that theory and the priority heuristic. Both violations are consistent with the transfer of attention exchange model. No one was found whose data were compatible with cumulative prospect theory, except for those that were also compatible with expected utility, and no one satisfied the priority heuristic.

Authors and Affiliations

Michael H. Birnbaum and Jeffrey P. Bahra

Keywords

Related Articles

Numerate decision makers don’t use more effortful strategies unless it pays: A process tracing investigation of skilled and adaptive strategy selection in risky decision making

The present study investigated skilled and adaptive strategy selection in risky decision making. We proposed that people with high objective numeracy, a strong predictor of general decision making skill, would have a bro...

Number preferences in lotteries

We explore people’s preferences for numbers in large proprietary data sets from two different lottery games. We find that choice is far from uniform, and exhibits some familiar and some new tendencies and biases. Players...

Risk perception and risk attitudes in Tokyo: A report of the first administration of DOSPERT+M in Japan

Background: The Domain-Specific Risk Taking scale (DOSPERT) has been used to measure risk perceptions and attitudes in several nations and cultures. Takahashi translated DOSPERT to Japanese but DOSPERT responses from Jap...

Why are gainers more risk seeking

The phenomenon that prior gains may increase people’s willingness to accept risky gambles is named as the house money effect (Thaler and Johnson, 1990). Many studies have shown that the “house money effect” is a robust p...

Validation of the Adult Decision-Making Competence in Slovak students

A study using a high school and college sample (age 18–26) was conducted to validate the Slovak version of the Adult Decision-Making Competence. The results were similar to findings reported by Bruine de Bruin, Parker, a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677900
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michael H. Birnbaum and Jeffrey P. Bahra (2012). Separating response variability from structural inconsistency to test models of risky decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677900