A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

We present a classification methodology that jointly assigns to a decision maker a best-fitting decision strategy for a set of choice data as well as a best-fitting stochastic specification of that decision strategy. Our methodology utilizes normalized maximum likelihood as a model selection criterion to compare multiple, possibly non-nested, stochastic specifications of candidate strategies. In addition to single strategy with “error” stochastic specifications, we consider mixture specifications, i.e., strategies comprised of a probability distribution over multiple strategies. In this way, our approach generalizes the classification framework of Bröder and Schiffer (2003a). We apply our methodology to an existing dataset and find that some decision makers are best fit by a single strategy with varying levels of error, while others are best described as using a mixture specification over multiple strategies.

Authors and Affiliations

Clintin P. Davis-Stober and Nicholas Brown

Keywords

Related Articles

An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate

The tempting fate effect is that the probability of a fateful outcome is deemed higher following an action that “tempts” the outcome than in the absence of such an action. In this paper we evaluate the hypothesis that th...

Using the ACT-R architecture to specify 39 quantitative process models of decision making

Hypotheses about decision processes are often formulated qualitatively and remain silent about the interplay of decision, memorial, and other cognitive processes. At the same time, existing decision models are specified...

On emotion specificity in decision making: Why feeling is for doing

We present a motivational account of the impact of emotion on decision making, termed the feeling-is-for-doing approach. We first describe the psychology of emotion and argue for a need to be specific when studying emoti...

How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods

In two studies, time preferences for financial gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic “staircase” choice method....

Interpersonal effects of expressed anger and sorrow in morally charged negotiation

The expression of emotion can play a significant role in strategic decision-making. In this study, we hypothesized that emotion expression alters behavior in morally charged negotiation. We investigated the impact of fac...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677863
  • DOI -
  • Views 158
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Clintin P. Davis-Stober and Nicholas Brown (2011). A shift in strategy or “error”? Strategy classification over multiple stochastic specifications. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677863