Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 5

Abstract

In considering moral dilemmas, people often judge the acceptability of exchanging individuals’ interests, rights, and even lives. Here we investigate the related, but often overlooked, question of how people decide who to sacrifice in a moral dilemma. In three experiments (total N = 558), we provide evidence that these decisions often depend on the feeling that certain people are fungible and interchangeable with one another, and that one factor that leads people to be viewed this way is shared nationality. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants read vignettes in which three individuals’ lives could be saved by sacrificing another person. When the individuals were characterized by their nationalities, participants chose to save the three endangered people by sacrificing someone who shared their nationality, rather than sacrificing someone from a different nationality. Participants do not show similar preferences, though, when individuals were characterized by their age or month of birth. In Experiment 3, we replicated the effect of nationality on participant’s decisions about who to sacrifice, and also found that they did not show a comparable preference in a closely matched vignette in which lives were not exchanged. This suggests that the effect of nationality on decisions of who to sacrifice may be specific to judgments about exchanges of lives.

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Białek, Jonathan Fugelsang and Ori Friedman

Keywords

Related Articles

Backward planning: Effects of planning direction on predictions of task completion time

People frequently underestimate the time needed to complete tasks and we examined a strategy – known as backward planning – that may counteract this optimistic bias. Backward planning involves starting a plan at the end...

Healthy choices in context: How contextual cues can influence the persuasiveness of framed health messages

Research has shown that framing messages in terms of benefits or detriments can have a substantial influence on intended behavior. For prevention behaviors, positively framed messages have been found to elicit stronger b...

Subjective integration of probabilistic information from experience and description

I report a new judgment task designed to investigate the subjective weights allotted to experience and description when integrating information from the two sources. Subjects estimated the percentage of red balls in a ba...

Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test

Much research in cognitive psychology has focused on the tendency to conserve limited cognitive resources. The CRT is the predominant measure of such miserly information processing, and also predicts a number of frequent...

When imagining future wealth influences risky decision making

The body of literature on the relationship between risk aversion and wealth is extensive. However, little attention has been given to examining how future realizations of wealth might affect (current) risk decisions. Usi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678375
  • DOI -
  • Views 122
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Michał Białek, Jonathan Fugelsang and Ori Friedman (2018). Choosing victims: Human fungibility in moral decision-making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678375