ABUSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE HEART OF THE EUROPE: CASES OF HUNGARY AND POLAND

Abstract

The European Union (EU) has been one of the most important representatives of democracy, both in the Union and in its policy towards neighboring countries, with the liberal values it has defended since its inception. However, while the EU has been intensively tested in recent years, the radical changes experienced on a global scale have also deeply affected the policies within the Union and resulted in the alienation of the member states from the values that the Union has upheld so far. The cases of democratic backsliding created especially in Hungary and Poland on the basis of legal regulations over the last decade and that the delayed and poor reaction from the Union to these regulations are currently being intensely debated. Therefore, the present study addresses the developments in Hungary and Poland in the light of the term “abusive constitutionalism” introduced by David Landau and Rosalind Dixon and intends to answer the question of “how liberal democracies are eroded by means of the amendments or replacements on constitutions”. The examples of Hungary and Poland are quite remarkable in respect to the transformation that their constitutional systems have gone through. Because these transformations occurred in a way contrary to the values of the Union, despite the fact that both countries are members of the EU. The present study argues that the reaction of the European Union and its related organs to the judicial reforms in these countries is insufficient and weak, and that the delay in imposing sanctions paves the way for Poland and Hungary to become increasingly anti-democratic by official means.

Authors and Affiliations

İrem NART

Keywords

Related Articles

IMPLICATIONS OF REALIST DEFENSIVE FOREIGN POLICY: TOWARDS A TURKISH INTERVENTION IN LIBYA DURING THE FIRST AND SECOND LIBYAN CRISES

Turkish foreign policy significantly shifted in the second decade of the AKP government, as signified by the adoption of the official ‘zero problems with neighbours’ policy in 2009. This shift was necessitated by the cou...

EUROPEAN IDENTITY IN POST-TRUTH ERA: EASTERN CASE

European identity exists within nationalist identities. This fact came into existence especially after European Union (EU) came together and evolved. European identity, especially in post-truth era where emotions are bei...

“SO SOMEHOW PISSED OFF, BECAUSE I’M ACTUALLY TURKISH”. BETWEEN AFFIRMATION AND CRITIQUE OF MIGRATION SOCIETY DISCOURSES IN THE SCHOOL CONTEXT

This article, which is oriented towards subjectification theory, examines the experiences of pupils who are considered to be “with a migration background” in the school context, the migration-society related attributions...

İSTİSNA HALİ ÇERÇEVESİNDE TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANAN KORONAVİRÜS ÖNLEMLERİNE DAİR BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Schmitt’e göre egemen istisna haline karar verendir. Bu istisna hali hukukun kendisini askıya aldığı, içeri ile dışarının belirsizleştiği bir alandır. Bu alanda herhangi bir şey üzerine kesin hüküm vermek zordur. Bu sebe...

A THEORETICAL LOOK ON GREEK RESPONSE TO THE REFUGEE CRISIS

The massive migration flows from the Middle Eastern countries towards the European Union had become one of the central issues in the policy-makers agendas. Especially, the period after 2015, often regarded as the Refugee...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP711606
  • DOI -
  • Views 65
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

İrem NART (2021). ABUSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE HEART OF THE EUROPE: CASES OF HUNGARY AND POLAND. Journal of International Relations and Political Science Studies, 1(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-711606