ARCHAISATION OF MODERN CULTURE: ROTATIONS, FORMATS, REPRESENTATIONS

Abstract

Conditions of destruction of representative systems and global transformations actualize the interest in the ancient layers of culture, which found an expression in the archaism of the cultural space and are engraved in the concepts of "new barbarism", "neo-archaism", and "neo-tribalism". In each era, interest in the past is clearly outlined by value guidelines. Thus, the humanistic content of the Renaissance era is associated with the revival of the ancient heritage; in the nineteenth century, the field of European culture is characterized by egyptomania and indomania. During the twentieth century, interest in primitiveness is growing from its understanding as "primitive remnants" to the recognition of the identity of the archaic world. But if the preceding epochs are characterized by a more or less clearly defined picture of the world, then the hermeneutic procedure for the restoration of true archaic culture is metaphorical and uncertain. The article investigates the role of archaising culture in its processes of sense formation, in accordance with the palimpsest model of culture in the context of cultural-traumatic discourse. It reveals the ambiguity of the tendencies of "new barbarism" in the processes of the dynamics of culture, which are both constructive and destructive. It is proved that the palimpsest model of modern culture in different textualities contributes to actualization of search for the primary text as the basis of the reminder of pre-history and the desire to restore the sacred in a desacralized world. Multilayerness of the semiotic space of culture leads to the need for the interaction of different genesis structures, which preserve the memory of the whole. As a result of the centrifugal cultural tendencies, separate "islands" of the sacral appear as a form of its existence in the "scattered" state. The powerful potential of mass culture as a representation of the neo-arсhaic manifests the simulative nature of imitation, while the demand for archaic substrate makes it possible, through its rethinking, to include in the constructive process the reproduction of projections into both the past and the future of culture.

Authors and Affiliations

Oksana PUSHONKOVA

Keywords

Related Articles

PHILOSOPHY OF INFORMATION BY LUCIANO FLORIDI – RELEVANCE OF INFORMATION ETHICS AND METHOD OF LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION

Introduction. The article tackles the question of correlation between philosophy and digital ICTs (information and communication technologies), the transformation of human mind and self-perception by virtual reality and...

INFORMATION AGGRESSION AS A COMPONENT OF INFORMATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WAR

Introduction. With the establishment of the information society and the global information space, the rapid development of social communications, information - computer and telecommunication technologies, the problem of...

МЕDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF МЕDIA-АRCHEOLOGY AND VISUAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Introduction. In the era of Post-Present, media are a universal characteristic of preserving and transmission of information, creating a new reality, since radically changing both perception and communication links. In t...

SOCIAL AND CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION IN REDUCING A DESTRUCTIVE IMPACT OF CORRUPTION IN THE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN UKRAINE

Under the conditions of reforming the modern Ukrainian educational system the main task is to create a qualitatively new system of training highly educated specialists of the postindustrial era, which will meet the deman...

SYMBOL AS A CATEGORY OF CULTURE AND ITS FUNCTIONAL LOAD THROUGH THE PRISM OF PHILOSOPPHICAL DOCTRINES

Introduction The attention is drawn to the role of the symbol in the modern world of intercultural communication. Hence the need for theoretical and methodological understanding of the symbol as a key phenomenon of cultu...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP291622
  • DOI -
  • Views 104
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oksana PUSHONKOVA (2017). ARCHAISATION OF MODERN CULTURE: ROTATIONS, FORMATS, REPRESENTATIONS. Вісник Черкаського університетету. Серія Філософія, 1(2), 42-49. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-291622