Assessment of Degree of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using Intraoperative Scoring System

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 10

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgery. But in every patient, there are different types of difficulties in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outcome may be different according to the difficulties. Aim: To assess and grade the degree of difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and their postoperative outcome using intraoperative scoring system devised. Materials and Methods: One hundred three consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria was all the cases of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and exclusion criteria was cases in which directly open cholecystectomy was performed. Intraoperative findings were assessed on the basis of five key aspects which includes: 1) Gallbladder appearance and amount of adhesions; 2) Degree of distension/ contraction of the gallbladder; 3) Ease of access; 4) Local/septic complications; and 5) Time taken to identify the cystic artery and duct. Results: Total 103 patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. The severity score was between 2-4 in 63 (61.16%) patients and between 5-7 in 20 (19.41%) patients. Mild to moderate degree of difficulty was encountered in 80 (77.66%), severe degree in 20 (19.41%) and extreme degree of difficulty in 03 (2.91%) patients in performing cholecystectomy and conversion to open surgery were done in 08 (7.76%) patients with score between 6 to 8. Conclusion: This scoring system is useful and reliable. If the intraoperative severity score is more, the severity of cholecystitis increases and then it is more difficult to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors and Affiliations

Navin Kumar, Shantanu Kumar Sahu, Karamjot Singh Bedi

Keywords

Related Articles

Raman Microspectrometry: An Alternative Method of Age Estimation from Dentin and Cementum

Introduction: Raman spectroscopy is simple, quick, sensitive and non destructive form of tissue examination that provides vital data about the structure, molecular composition and interactions within a sample. The human...

Hypermethylation Markers in Saliva of Smokers with High Risk for Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders

ABSTRACT Introduction: Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder (OPMD) is considered as a disease symptom which if neglected without treatment may lead to cancer. OPMDs comprise leukoplakia, erythroplakia, erytholeukoplakia (...

Consistency of Fractional Anisotropy Values Using Different Combinations of b-Value and Time of Echo (TE) in Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Normal Brain White Matter

ABSTRACT Introduction: Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values are considered as a solid concrete index for determining white matter integrity in ageing and neurodegenerative diseases. FA is more comparable and reliable parame...

Assessing the Changes in Cariogram Generated Risk Profiles following the use of Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Chewing Gums

ABSTRACT Introduction: Caries risk assessment is an essential element in the prevention of the disease. Targeted preventive strategies customised for each individual is economically beneficial and rational. Casein Phosph...

Superoxide Dismutase: A Biomarker for Early Diagnosis of Tuberculosis

Abstract Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health concern in developing countries. Traditional diagnostic methods such as microscopic detection of organism and histopathological examination are limited in...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP364890
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/31116.10763
  • Views 92
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Navin Kumar, Shantanu Kumar Sahu, Karamjot Singh Bedi (2017). Assessment of Degree of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using Intraoperative Scoring System. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(10), 11-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-364890