Assessment of Degree of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using Intraoperative Scoring System

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 10

Abstract

Introduction: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most commonly performed minimally invasive surgery. But in every patient, there are different types of difficulties in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and outcome may be different according to the difficulties. Aim: To assess and grade the degree of difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and their postoperative outcome using intraoperative scoring system devised. Materials and Methods: One hundred three consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, were included in the study. Inclusion criteria was all the cases of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and exclusion criteria was cases in which directly open cholecystectomy was performed. Intraoperative findings were assessed on the basis of five key aspects which includes: 1) Gallbladder appearance and amount of adhesions; 2) Degree of distension/ contraction of the gallbladder; 3) Ease of access; 4) Local/septic complications; and 5) Time taken to identify the cystic artery and duct. Results: Total 103 patients of laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this study. The severity score was between 2-4 in 63 (61.16%) patients and between 5-7 in 20 (19.41%) patients. Mild to moderate degree of difficulty was encountered in 80 (77.66%), severe degree in 20 (19.41%) and extreme degree of difficulty in 03 (2.91%) patients in performing cholecystectomy and conversion to open surgery were done in 08 (7.76%) patients with score between 6 to 8. Conclusion: This scoring system is useful and reliable. If the intraoperative severity score is more, the severity of cholecystitis increases and then it is more difficult to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors and Affiliations

Navin Kumar, Shantanu Kumar Sahu, Karamjot Singh Bedi

Keywords

Related Articles

Role of D-Mannose as an Antiglycolytic Agent to Eliminate Preanalytical Error in Glucose Testing

Introduction: Correct assessment of glucose is required for diagnosis of diabetes and monitoring of antihyperglycaemic therapy in adults as well monitoring neonatal hypoglycaemia. As per American Diabetes Association, so...

Community Acquired Burkholderia cepacia Bacteraemia Presenting as MODS in an Immunocompetent Individual: An Unusual Case

Burkholderia cepacia has been recognized as a group of highly virulent organisms known as Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc). Bcc are ubiquitous in nature and most commonly found in moist environment, on plant roots and...

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence among Females with Vaginal Delivery, Lower Segmental Cesarean Section, Diabetic and Hypothyroidism and Its Impact on Quality of Life

Introduction: Urinary incontinence is defined as involuntary loss of urine that represents both hygienic and social problem to the individual. Prevalence of urinary incontinence in women is nearly 30 to 40% in middle age...

Comparison of the Effects of Zonisamide and Flupirtine on Paclitaxel Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats

ABSTRACT Introduction: Many peripheral and central causes lead to neuropathic pain disorders. Effective treatment of neuropathic pain is not completely manageable and hence, it becomes necessary to evaluate the applicati...

Histopathological Analysis of Psoriasis in a Study of 24 Cases

ABSTRACT Introduction: As for any other organ system, diagnosis of skin disease involves history and examination. An instant diagnosis can be arrived upon by virtue of visibility of the skin taking into account various v...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP364890
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/31116.10763
  • Views 44
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Navin Kumar, Shantanu Kumar Sahu, Karamjot Singh Bedi (2017). Assessment of Degree of Difficulty in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using Intraoperative Scoring System. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(10), 11-14. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-364890