Assessment of Efficacy of Amlodipine with Cilnidipine in Hypertensive Patients: A Comparative Study

Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: The major problem encountered in treatment patients of hypertension and diabtetic patients with hypertension is controlling their Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP). One of the calcium channel blockers (CCBs) with outstanding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile is amlodipine. Cilnidipine is the newer generation of CCB that also inhibits sympathomimetic activity. Hence; we undertook the present study to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and cilnidipine in treating patients of hypertension. Material and methods: The present study included assessment of 90 hypertensive patients that were undergoing treatment for the same. Auscultatory method with standard mercury sphygmomanometer was used for the measurement of the blood pressure. All the 90 patients were divided into two study groups with 45 patients in each group. The first group comprised of patients who were prescribed amlodipine 5–10 mg/day while the other group included patients who were given cilnidipine 10–20 mg/day orally as a treatment protocol for hypertension. The mean values of Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) during check up were recorded and assessed. All the results were analyzed by SPSS software. Results: A total of 90 patients were included in the present study. The mean SBP in the Amlodipine group patients and in the cilnidipine group patients was 139.1 and 144.2 mm of mercury respectively. The mean DBP in the Amlodipine group patients and in the cilnidipine group patients was 80.2 and 85.3 mm of mercury respectively. Non-significant results were obtained while comparing the mean SBO and DBP among patients of the two study groups. 28 patients in amlodipine group and 5 patients in the cilnidipine group showed the presence of edema. Conclusion: In hypertensive patients, equal efficacy is exhibited by both amlodipine and cilnidipine in reduction of blood pressure.

Authors and Affiliations

K. Anantha Babu

Keywords

Related Articles

Prevalence of H. Pylori in Dyspepsia Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital of Bangalore

Introduction: Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori) is the main risk factor for peptic ulcer, gastric associated lymphoid tissue and gastric adenocarcinoma. Several studies have revealed H. Pylori association in 70-75% cases o...

A Successful Effort of Corrective Intervention in Deviated Growth by Nature Leading to Survival of an Infant by Pediatric Dental Professionals: A Case Report

Introduction: Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) is a congenital condition constituting of a classic triad of Micrognathia, Glossoptosis and Cleft palate. The primary defect lies in the arrested development of mandible leading...

Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Elective PCI of Cabg for Multivessel and Left Main Disease

Introduction: Optimal revascularization strategy in patients with coronary artery disease remains a subject of debate between interventional cardiologists and surgeons. Numerous large scale randomized trials addressed th...

Serum C-Reactive Protien (CRP) - A Dependent Prognostic Marker in Pulmonary Tuberculosis

the world and accounts for nearly 1/4th of the global burden of TB. So study aimed to assess the values of Serum C - reactive protein (CRP) in cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) and to evaluate its utility as a serolog...

Evaluation of the Role of Transdermal Diclofenac Patch (Nupatch) in Management of Pain in Postperative Patients

Introduction: The present study was planed and conducted in the surgery Department, Government Medical College and Rajindra Hospital, Patiala to evaluate the role of transdermal diclofenac nupatch in post operative pain...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP430046
  • DOI -
  • Views 96
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

K. Anantha Babu (2017). Assessment of Efficacy of Amlodipine with Cilnidipine in Hypertensive Patients: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research, 4(4), 956-958. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-430046