Biased calculations: Numeric anchors influence answers to math equations

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

People must often perform calculations in order to produce a numeric estimate (e.g., a grocery-store shopper estimating the total price of his or her shopping cart contents). The current studies were designed to test whether estimates based on calculations are influenced by comparisons with irrelevant anchors. Previous research has demonstrated that estimates across a wide range of contexts assimilate toward anchors, but none has examined estimates based on calculations. In two studies, we had participants compare the answers to math problems with anchors. In both studies, participants’ estimates assimilated toward the anchor values. This effect was moderated by time limit such that the anchoring effects were larger when the participants’ ability to engage in calculations was limited by a restrictive time limit.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrew R. Smith and Paul D. Windschitl

Keywords

Related Articles

Ambiguity aversion in a delay analogue of the Ellsberg Paradox

Decision makers are often ambiguity averse, preferring options with subjectively known probabilities to options with unknown probabilities. The Ellsberg paradox is the best-known example of this phenomenon. Ambiguity has...

Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor

The authors review their own empirical work inspired by the adaptive toolbox metaphor. The review examines factors influencing strategy selection and execution in multi-attribute inference tasks (e.g., information costs,...

Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won’t accept less

We explore different contexts and mechanisms that might promote or alleviate the gender effect in risk aversion. Our main result is that we do not find gender differences in risk aversion when the choice is framed as a w...

An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate

The tempting fate effect is that the probability of a fateful outcome is deemed higher following an action that “tempts” the outcome than in the absence of such an action. In this paper we evaluate the hypothesis that th...

Does menu design influence retirement investment choices? Evidence from Italian occupational pension funds

Previous research has demonstrated that consumers’ decisions regarding supplementary pensions could be affected by biases. Bernatzi and Thaler’s experiment demonstrated that menu design can influence pension fund enrollm...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677785
  • DOI -
  • Views 129
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrew R. Smith and Paul D. Windschitl (2011). Biased calculations: Numeric anchors influence answers to math equations. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(2), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677785