Brak możliwości uznania orzeczenia zagranicznego sądu powszechnego oddalającego skargę o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego – glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 6.11.2009 r.

Journal Title: ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 44

Abstract

The Supreme Court issued a decree which states that a verdict of a foreign court which removes a petition for the reversal of an award of a court of arbitration is not liable for recognition based on the article 1145 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The gloss discusses the verdict of the Supreme Court in a wider context of a worldwide discussion in regard to possibility of accepting foreign verdicts of common courts of law which reverse an award of a court of arbitration (so-called awarding judgment). In the author’s opinion, the Supreme Court accurately – in defiance of a dominating tendency in judicature of other countries – rejects a possibility of a privileged creditor to use awarding judgment. Moreover, settling of the Supreme Court has a wider meaning. It seems to result in not recognizing foreign verdicts of which the subject is recognition or affirmation of executability of an arbitration order. The accepted standpoint limits a possibility to use techniques, such as forum shopping and excessive harassment of a debtor. It also supports autonomy of arbitration orders by making them separate from evaluation made by court of the place of arbitration. Evaluation whether certain arbitration order qualifies to recognition or execution should be up to a court from the country of recognition or execution. There are no reasons for that court to be constricted with previous rulings of courts where the arbitration took place.

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Zachariasiewicz

Keywords

Related Articles

Znaczenie naprawienia szkody oraz pojednania pomiędzy pokrzywdzonym a sprawcą w procesie sądowego wymiaru kary. Uwagi na tle wybranych regulacji karnomaterialnych

The purpose of this paper is giving attention to certain penal solutions, emphasizing the value of loss compensation and reconciliation between a victim and a perpetrator in the course of judicial sentencing. Pursuant to...

Zasada dobrowolności mediacji w świetle nowelizacji Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego z 10.9.2015 r.

The article “The principle of voluntariness of mediation in the light of the amendment to the Code of Civil Procedure of 10th of September 2015” discusses legal issues regarding the current regulations that modified the...

Concurrent jurisdiction and its consequences in context of enforcement of interim measures of protection in arbitral proceedings

The purpose of this article is to analyze the issue of concurrent jurisdiction between a state court and an arbitral tribunal as well as between a state court and an emergency arbitrator (EA) in the perspective of Polish...

Wyłączenie sądownictwa polubownego w rozporządzeniu Nr 1215/2012

This article deals with the exclusion of arbitration from the subject matter scope of application of the Regulation No. 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial m...

Bibliografia kwartalnika ADR za lata 2015(4)–2018(3)

Bibliografia kwartalnika ADR za lata 2015(4)–2018(3).

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP544157
  • DOI -
  • Views 28
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maciej Zachariasiewicz (2018). Brak możliwości uznania orzeczenia zagranicznego sądu powszechnego oddalającego skargę o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego – glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 6.11.2009 r.. ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja, 4(44), 53-74. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-544157