Brak możliwości uznania orzeczenia zagranicznego sądu powszechnego oddalającego skargę o uchylenie wyroku sądu polubownego – glosa do postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z 6.11.2009 r.
Journal Title: ADR. Arbitraż i Mediacja - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 44
Abstract
The Supreme Court issued a decree which states that a verdict of a foreign court which removes a petition for the reversal of an award of a court of arbitration is not liable for recognition based on the article 1145 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The gloss discusses the verdict of the Supreme Court in a wider context of a worldwide discussion in regard to possibility of accepting foreign verdicts of common courts of law which reverse an award of a court of arbitration (so-called awarding judgment). In the author’s opinion, the Supreme Court accurately – in defiance of a dominating tendency in judicature of other countries – rejects a possibility of a privileged creditor to use awarding judgment. Moreover, settling of the Supreme Court has a wider meaning. It seems to result in not recognizing foreign verdicts of which the subject is recognition or affirmation of executability of an arbitration order. The accepted standpoint limits a possibility to use techniques, such as forum shopping and excessive harassment of a debtor. It also supports autonomy of arbitration orders by making them separate from evaluation made by court of the place of arbitration. Evaluation whether certain arbitration order qualifies to recognition or execution should be up to a court from the country of recognition or execution. There are no reasons for that court to be constricted with previous rulings of courts where the arbitration took place.
Authors and Affiliations
Maciej Zachariasiewicz
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP544157
- DOI -
- Views 34
- Downloads 0
Zdatność arbitrażowa sporów w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki
Arbitrability in American legal systems differs in many aspects from the continental definition of this term. It is much broader. It seems as if the American non-arbitrability is the equivalent to continental arbitrabili...
Removal of Arbitrators for Bias in the UK: Recent Case Law
Trust in the arbitrator appointed to hear a dispute is vital for the credibility of the process. The rule against bias is one of the most basic principles of natural justice (D. Thomas, Conflict of Interest Can Be Enough...
Mediacje w Centrum Mediacji przy Sądzie Polubownym przy Komisji Nadzoru Finansowego
The article refers to an institution of mediation at Mediation Centre at Arbitration Court at the Polish Financial Supervision Authority. The Court operates on the Polish financial market since March 2008, and in Poland,...
Sprawozdanie z międzynarodowej konferencji naukowej pt. „Arbitration and Legal Reasoning” (Londyn, 16–17.11.2016 r.)
W dniach 16–17.11.2016 r. w Londynie odbyła się konferencja naukowa pt. „Arbitration and Legal Reasoning” organizowana przez Centre for Law and Society in a Global Context oraz School of International Arbitration Queen M...
Od ugody pretorskiej po urzędy pośrednictwa – przedsądowe i pozasądowe metody rozwiązywania sporów cywilnych w prawie austriackim
The aim of the present study is to depict a regulation of conciliatory methods of dispute resolution in Austrian civil law since the 19th century. Therefore, on a wide historical background and in connection with a Germa...