BRIEF COMMENTS ON ISSUES CONCERNING THE FORFEITURE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN THE CIVIL TRIAL

Abstract

The Code of Civil Procedure lays down a series of timeframes in which the parties may propose the evidence under the sanction of the forfeiture of this right and, on the other hand, at the written stage regulated by art. 200 Civ. Proc. Code the application may also be annulled because the applicant has not proposed evidence within the 10-day time limit set by the court to fill the claim. We propose to analyze both the interferences between the sanction of the cancellation of the application and the forfeiture of right at the regularization stage, but also the scope of art. 254 par. (2) Civ. Proc. Code, respectively the cases in which the evidence may be submitted beyond the term stipulated by the law. In the paper we will propose solutions to the applicable sanction for not showing evidence in the civil action, analyzing the arguments proposed by the doctrine both for nullity and for forfeiture of right. In this respect, we will discuss the particular cases of art. 194 lit. e) Civ. Proc. Code on witness identification data and interrogators of the legal entity. In the last part, we will address the question of the removal of the sanction of forfeiture in cases where the administration of the evidence does not lead to the adjournment of the trial, more precisely the situations in which this law is to be applied.

Authors and Affiliations

Emilian-Constantin MEIU

Keywords

Related Articles

SHORT ESSAY ON THE LEGAL EFFECTS OF SIMULATED CONTRACTS IN REGARD TO THIRD PARTIES

The simulation is a lie born out of the will of the parties to evade showing successors or third parties the truth. The Romanian legislation has a tolerant approach towards simulation, and permits it, in general. The New...

BANK RESOLUTION

The bank resolution represents one of the technical and legal instruments introduced in the legislative framework belonging to the banking financial market. Within the resolution process, credit institutions and other fi...

THE LEGAL REGIME OF UNFAIR CLAUSES IN COMPARATIVE LAW

The concept of unfair clauses has legitimately held the headlines in recent European case law and its relevance is due to the innovative case law solutions and due to the increasing volume of legal contractual relationsh...

ASSESSMENTS REGARDING THE LEGAL NATURE OF AN ACT BETWEEN A LABOR LAW ACT, A NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACT OR AN INDIVIDUAL ADMINISTRATIVE ACT

This article aims to establish the legal nature of a regulation, using an analysis of the characteristics and specific criteria of each type of act and concluding with the determination of the legal nature of such a regu...

The Consent of the Victim as Legal Defence in Cybercrime cases

The rise of Cybercrimes provides with great concerns among users, industry, banking sector or public institutions in terms of how much secure their computer systems or computer data are. Both Ethical and Non-Ethical hack...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP301992
  • DOI -
  • Views 124
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Emilian-Constantin MEIU (2018). BRIEF COMMENTS ON ISSUES CONCERNING THE FORFEITURE OF RIGHT TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE IN THE CIVIL TRIAL. Challenges of the knowledge society ( Provocari ale societatii cunoasterii ), 10(12), 270-273. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-301992