Can Kierkegaard Preach?
Journal Title: ИДЕИ. ФИЛОСОФСКО СПИСАНИЕ - Year 2014, Vol 2, Issue 1
Abstract
Growing up in a Pentecostal Christian subculture in the American Southeast, I have often heard the phrase: “That can preach.” This idiomatic sentence is a bit difficult to explain in that it means both that some idea would make for good fodder for a sermon, but also that the idea would make for a good sermon because of its ability to “move” a congregation. Interestingly, during sermons in which the congregation is so “moved,” one often hears affirmative shouts of “Preach it!” Perhaps due to my own phenomenological disposition or perhaps due to my Pentecostal heritage, I think that the notion of an idea being something “that can preach,” is worthy of some philosophical consideration. Are there some ideas that can’t “preach,” as it were? And, if so, is this due to their lack of congregational motivation? That is, is it primarily a matter of rhetorical and emotional impact? Or, is the fact that some ideas can’t “preach” due to the ideas themselves? That is, is it primarily a matter of conceptual or theological content? Said slightly otherwise, in the hands of a good rhetorician, can anything “preach”? Or can that which “can preach” be preached by anyone? Since this essay will be intentionally short, I am not going to be able to give an extended consideration to these questions here. But, as something of a springboard to what I hope will become a more thorough engagement elsewhere, I will look at the work of Søren Kierkegaard as a preliminary case study. Accordingly, the specific question that will occupy us here is: “Can Kierkegaard Preach?” I mean for this question to be heard in two ways. On the one hand, this question asks if the ideas of Kierkegaard can be translated into the mode of discourse that would make for productive (perhaps “moving”) sermons in the setting of contemporary church services. On the other hand, this question asks if Kierkegaard, himself, could deliver such sermons. The first formulation concerns primarily the subjectivity of Christian life and the second formulation concerns primarily the authority of Christian witness. In this all too brief essay, I will suggest that Kierkegaard’s though can indeed “preach,” but whether Kierkegaard himself can “preach it” depends on how we understand the role and task of preaching itself.
Authors and Affiliations
J. Aaron Simmons
In search of a European identity from «Knowledge Society» to «Wisdom Society» (Thematic outline)
Слово и термин «Европа», вступая в неравную схватку с понятием «Христианский мир», которое к тому времени употреблялось уже более тысячи лет и исторически было утвержде-но шестью веками Крестовых походов, и отличалось э...
On the specifics of philosophical Postmodern interpretation
The article explores the reasons of negative assessments of philosophical maxims of the founders of postmodern philosophy. It is highlighted the overall transformation process of the role and importance of philosophical...
O. Potebnya and D. Ovsyaniko-Kulikovskyi: an attempt of the comparative analysis of lingvophilosophical oncepts
The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of O. Potebnya`s and D. Ovsyaniko-Rulikovskyi`s lingvophilosophical views. In lingvophilosophical views of both scientists observed the fact that language is a particul...
For the 25the anniversary of the Department of Religious Studies of Institute of Philosophy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Prof. Anatoly Kolodny
Днес ние запознаваме българския читател и философската общност на България с един от най-известните научни центрове на Украйна – Отделението по религиознание на Института по философия „Г.С.Сковорода” на Националната акад...
Liturgical traditions of Eastern Christianity and the spread of Byzantine culture
The liturgical rite is one of the basic elements of religion, as it is an expression of religious faith by means of national cultures. Liturgical rites express the cultural specifics of the nations that tried to express...