Comparative Evaluation of Two Bis-GMA Based Orthodontic Bonding Adhesives - A Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal Title: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research - Year 2017, Vol 11, Issue 4

Abstract

Introduction: Of the various orthodontic bonding materials, orthofix is a fairly new entrant into this field. This material was exclusively introduced for orthodontic bonding purposes; however, the application of this material for orthodontic purpose has not been scientifically evaluated so far. Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate by an in-vivo double blinded split mouth rando mized clinical trial, the overall bond failure rates of two Bis-GMA based composite materials namely Transbond XT and Orthofix. Materials and Methods: Thirty three participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated by lottery method into two groups. Group A participants had maxillary right and the mandibular left quadrants bonded using Orthofix and the remaining quadrants were bonded using Transbond XT. In Group B, the quadrants were reversed. Both groups were followed for a period of six months and were reviewed every 3-4 weeks. If a bond failed, the details were recorded and the duration of treatment before each breakage was calculated. Data were analyzed using Independent t-test and chi-square test. (p< 0.05) at 90% power. Results: The overall bond failure rate for 263 brackets was 2.7% for Orthofix and 3.6% for Transbond XT. The mean esitmated survival time was 221.58 days for Transbond XT and for Orthofix was 220.07 days. The difference between these mean values were statistically insignificant (p>0.05). Similarly, failure rates of the anterior and posterior segment were compared and no difference was observed between the groups (p>0.05). The maxillary and mandibular teeth were compared and more failures were found in the mandibular teeth among both the groups but they were not statistically significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: The overall bond failure rate and mean survival time for Transbond XT was similar to Orthofix with no statistically significant difference.

Authors and Affiliations

Christine Samantha, Shantha Sundari, Shyamala Chandrasekhar, Gautham Sivamurty, Saravana Dinesh

Keywords

Related Articles

Dosimetric Comparison between Two Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy Planning Techniques for Carcinoma of Breast Following Conservative Surgery

Abstract Introduction: The anatomy of the chest wall is curved which makes it quite complicated to plan radiation therapy for breast cancer. There are different techniques for delivering external beam radiation therapy....

Assessing the Impact of a Structured Tuberculosis Training Activity on the Knowledge and Attitude of Community Volunteers

ABSTRACT Introduction: With the paucity of health workforce for Tuberculosis (TB) in India a cadre of trained community volunteers can effectively contribute to the prevention and control of TB in a particular community....

Osseous Metaplasia in Adenocarcinoma

ABSTRACT Osseous Metaplasia (OM) or heterotopic ossification is a rare phenomenon with unknown aetiology that is characterised by the formation of mature bone elements in the stroma of different tumors. Awareness of this...

Effect of Myristica fragrans Extract on Food Intake and Body Weight in Experimental Models

ABSTRACT Introduction: Myristica fragrans (Mace) is one of the commonly used Indian spices. It was used in traditional medicine to treat digestive problems, rheumatism, hyperlipidaemia, diarrhoea and insomnia. More food...

Association between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms of SMAD3 and BMP5 with the Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis

Introduction: The role of genetic factors influencing osteoarthritis (OA) susceptibility is well documented and several candidate genes have been identified to be associated with it. Among these genes are Bone Morphogene...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP340043
  • DOI 10.7860/JCDR/2017/16716.9665
  • Views 108
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Christine Samantha, Shantha Sundari, Shyamala Chandrasekhar, Gautham Sivamurty, Saravana Dinesh (2017). Comparative Evaluation of Two Bis-GMA Based Orthodontic Bonding Adhesives - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(4), 40-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-340043