“Comparative Study Between Two Incisions Two Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy And Four Incisions Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”

Journal Title: IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) - Year 2018, Vol 17, Issue 1

Abstract

At times Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy becomes difficult. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy may be rendered difficult by various problems encountered during surgery. Aims And Objective: To calculate the male to female ratio in case of gall stones, age distribution along with the operative difficulties and techniques in two incisions two ports and four incisions four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy and compare the outcome of two ports and four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of operation time, hospital stay, complication rate, cosmesis, conversion rate to open Cholecystectomy. Material And Methods: The present study will be conducted in three years on patients of gall bladder disease admitted for cholecystectomy throughout patient department / Emergency in Subharti medical college in whom laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be attempted. Number of patient will be 100. 50 patients will be planned for two incisions(10mm,5mm) two ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 50 patients will be planned for four incisions(10mm,10mm,5mm,5mm) four ports (Standard) laparoscopic cholecystectomySampling Technique: Patients were selected alternatively for Two Incisions Two Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Four Incisions Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Observation And Results: So we conclude from the study that Two incisions two ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy has lesser hospital stay, lesser post operative pain, lesser post operative analgesia requirement, far superior cosmesis and similar complication, operative time and conversion rate compared to four incisions four ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We believe that two incisions two ports laparoscopic cholecystectomy is better than Single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS) because SILS require different orientation during surgery. It also require special instrument such as reticulating instruments and multi channel ports during surgery and incision at umbilicus is greater than two port technique(15 mm in SILS v/s 10 mm in two port technique). There are higher chances of occurrence of umbilical hernia in SILS as compared to two port techniques.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr Kumar Deepak, Dr Bawa Manjul, Dr Sumit Kansal, Dr Singh Ketan, Dr Attri P. C, Dr Chaudhary Neetu

Keywords

Related Articles

Clinical, Microbiological and radiological study of community acquired Pneumonia

Background: The true incidence of pneumonia acquired in the community is unknown, but this is a common clinical problem worldwide especially in developing countries and remains a leading cause of death in India. Aims and...

An Investigation of the Prevalence And the Influential Factors Affecting Tooth wear

Background:tooth wear is common and increases by the age,the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of tooth wear in the adult population of Jeddah and to investigate the factors associated with such tooth wear...

“Next Is Nexus” – A Retrospective Study To Check The Usefulness Of The Nexus Criteria Decision Instrument For Clearing The Cervical Spine Injury Following Blunt Trauma.

Fear of failure to identify cervical spine injury has led to extremely liberal use of radiography in patients with blunt trauma and remotely possible neck injury. Eliminating even a small proportion of the cervical-spine...

Halitosis-An Update

Bad breath can be detrimental to one's self- image and confidence causing social, emotional, and psychological anxiety. With the majority of breath problems having an oral origin, the dental office is the most logical pl...

Hepatic Osteodystrophy- An overlooked complication

Hepatic osteodystrophyis a metabolic bone disease commonly seen in patients with chronic liver disease(CLD). Osteoporosis&osteomalaciadevelops in most of the patients with advanced liver disease. Regardless of the etiolo...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP262856
  • DOI 10.9790/0853-1701011722
  • Views 49
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr Kumar Deepak, Dr Bawa Manjul, Dr Sumit Kansal, Dr Singh Ketan, Dr Attri P. C, Dr Chaudhary Neetu (2018). “Comparative Study Between Two Incisions Two Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy And Four Incisions Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy”. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS), 17(1), 17-22. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-262856