Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to 0.25% Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2017, Vol 5, Issue 11

Abstract

Introduction: relief of intra and post operative pain has gained importance in recent years. Nerve blocks from the cornerstone in this arena. Brachial plexus block is a commonly used technique for majority of upper limb surgeries. Aim: To evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as an adjuvant to low dose bupivacaine 0.25% in terms of onset, duration, and quality of sensory and motor block when used for supraclavicular brachial plexux block. Materials and Methods: after the approval of ethical committee, 80 ASA grade I and II patients of either sex, between 18-60 years of age undergoing orthopaedic and plastic surgeries under supraclavicular block were studied after randomly assigning them into two groups of 40 each. Group D: Bupivacaine 0.25% (34 ml) +dexmedetomidine 1 microgm/kg Group F : Bupivacaine 0.25% (34 ml) +fentanyl 1 microgm/kg After baseline investigations and preoperative routine assessment, the consenting patients were premedicated with inj midazolam 0.03 mg/kg and inj glycopyrrolate 5 microgm per kg Iv 10 minutes prior to surgery after putting ECG,NIBP ,SPO2 monitors and securing 18 G IV cannula in the non operative upper limb. Block was given using paresthesia technique. Onset ,duration and quality of both sensory and motor block in either group were studied .use of rescue analgesia in both the groups in post operative period was compared up to 24 hours. Results: onset of both sensory and motor block was faster, 2.95 +/- 0.0693 minutes in group D versus 4.275+/-0.933 minutes in group F ; and 5.45+/-0.86 minutes in group D versus 6.025+/-0.861 minutes in group F respectively; total duration of block was prolonged, 608+/- 38.84 minutes in group D and 383+/- 27.66 minutes in group F Conclusion: dexmedetomidine is superior to fentanyl as an adjuvant to low dose bupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block.

Authors and Affiliations

Padara Basavaraj

Keywords

Related Articles

Influence Of Implant Shape On Stress Distribution In The Maxilla And Mandible –A Review

Influence of Implant Shape on Stress Distribution in the Maxilla and Mandible is a review article to analyse the stress distribution among the various shapes of implants and the bone response to the stress. The implant s...

Diagnostic Accuracy of FNAC in Relation to Histopathology in Bone Tumors

Background: Bone tumors constitute approximately 1% of all tumors affecting the human body. The key to their accurate recognition is the utilization of an integrated approach that assesses and correlates the clinical, ra...

Study of coagulation profile in hepatic disorders in a Tertiary Care Centre

Introduction: Liver plays the important role of synthesis of coagulation and anti coagulation proteins. Thus derangement of liver functions can lead to alteration and abnormal balance of these pathways. Materials and Met...

Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma with Giant Cell: A Cytological, Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Study of A Rare Differential

Malignant Fibrous histiocytoma (MFH) is now diagnosis of exclusion, comprising <5% of adult soft tissue malignant lesion. MFH predominantly is originating from extremities and retroperitoneum. Uncommon presentation can b...

Upregulation of Peripheral Blood Levels of Immune-Regulatory Interleukin-10 Cytokine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-infected Compared to Non-infected Pregnant Women

Alterations in the cytokine status have been suggested to be at least partly responsible for the immune tolerance during pregnancy. Indeed, interleukin-10 (IL-10) cytokine is known to control inflammationinduced patholog...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP525798
  • DOI -
  • Views 75
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Padara Basavaraj (2017). Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to 0.25% Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 5(11), 31099-31106. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-525798