Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: In spite of tremendous advances in contemporary anesthesia practice, airway management continues to be of paramount importance to the anesthesiologist. Hemodynamic changes are the major undesirable consequences of endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy. The supraglottic airway device is a novel device that fills the gap in airway management between tracheal intubation and use of face mask. In view of this, the present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices L MA Proseal and I-gel. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups of 30 each. In Group P (n=30) LMA Proseal and Group I (n=30) I-gel were used respectively. Both the devices were compared in relation to ease of insertion assessed in terms of Modified Lund and Stovener criteria, jaw relaxation based on Young’s criteria, number of attempts for insertion and hemodynamic changes. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data. I-gel was significantly easier to insert than LMA-Proseal (P < 0.05) (Chi-square test). The mean time for insertion was more with Group P (17.80 + 1.69 secs) than with Group I (15.9 + 2.52 secs) (P < 0.05). The success rate of first attempt insertion was more with Group I (P < 0.05). There was siginificant difference in SBP and MAP changes during insertion and after proseal LMA compared with Igel(P<0.001). There was no evidence of airway complications. Sore throat was significantly more evident in Group P. Conclusion: Both LMA Proseal and I-gel can be used safely and effectively in selected patients undergoing general anaesthesia. I-gel is easy to insert compared to LMA Proseal.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Impact of resident training on anaesthesia induction times

Background: The increasing role of ambulatory surgery has emphasized the need for an anaesthetic technique with smooth induction and rapid recovery and minimal side effects. It may have an impact of training. The effect...

Comparison of post-operative analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine using ultrasound guided oblique subcostal transverse abdominis plane block in open cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia

Background: Cholecystectomy involves upper abdominal incision with considerable postoperative pain. Adequate postoperative analgesia has to be provided to prevent major pulmonary complications in the postoperative period...

Evaluation of adding clonidine to lignocaine during bier’s block in upper limb surgeries

Background and aims: Bier’s block a.k.a Intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA) is used for short duration procedures for limb surgeries. IVRA provides reliable analgesia with good muscular relaxation of the extremity di...

A comparative study to know the effectiveness of butorphanol versus fentanyl in laparoscopic surgeries for balanced anaesthesia

Background:Fentanyl and butorphanol both opioids are belonging to different subgroupsare in usefor balanced anaesthesia for long time.The present study aimed to compare effectiveness ofbutorphanolvs fentanyl in laparosco...

Comparing effect of Phenylephrine and ephedrine in patients undergoing lower segment caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia

Background: Spinal anesthesia, a frequently used technique for caesarean delivery may be associated with maternal hypotension in as many 85% of patients. Various vasopressor have been studied for the treatment. Aim: The...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521011
  • DOI 10.26611/1015928
  • Views 168
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar (2019). Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 123-128. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521011