Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: In spite of tremendous advances in contemporary anesthesia practice, airway management continues to be of paramount importance to the anesthesiologist. Hemodynamic changes are the major undesirable consequences of endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy. The supraglottic airway device is a novel device that fills the gap in airway management between tracheal intubation and use of face mask. In view of this, the present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices L MA Proseal and I-gel. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups of 30 each. In Group P (n=30) LMA Proseal and Group I (n=30) I-gel were used respectively. Both the devices were compared in relation to ease of insertion assessed in terms of Modified Lund and Stovener criteria, jaw relaxation based on Young’s criteria, number of attempts for insertion and hemodynamic changes. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data. I-gel was significantly easier to insert than LMA-Proseal (P < 0.05) (Chi-square test). The mean time for insertion was more with Group P (17.80 + 1.69 secs) than with Group I (15.9 + 2.52 secs) (P < 0.05). The success rate of first attempt insertion was more with Group I (P < 0.05). There was siginificant difference in SBP and MAP changes during insertion and after proseal LMA compared with Igel(P<0.001). There was no evidence of airway complications. Sore throat was significantly more evident in Group P. Conclusion: Both LMA Proseal and I-gel can be used safely and effectively in selected patients undergoing general anaesthesia. I-gel is easy to insert compared to LMA Proseal.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Role of Inj. Dexamethasone for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic surgeries

Aims and Objectives: To study the role of inj. Dexamethasone for early and late Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting in laparoscopic surgeries. And also to record side effects of dexamethasone. Study Design: Prospective, r...

Intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine compared with hyperbaric bupivacaine for lower segment caesareansection

Background: The aim of this study was to compare clinical efficacy and safety of isobaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for elective cesarean section.Methods: A prospective, randomized stud...

Reasons of cancellation of elective cases on the day of surgery - A retrospective study

Background and Aim: Hospitals invest major resources in maintaining and arranging Operation rooms, appointing anaesthetists, Operating surgeons, and OT staff to run an institute. But unindicted cancellation or postponeme...

Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on acid base balance during laparoscopic surgeries

Background: Carbon dioxide is the most commonly used gas to induce pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgeries, as CO2 levels in blood and expiratory gas can be easily measured and monitored. However, insufflations of...

Comparison of the ultrasound guided technique versus the traditional blind anatomical landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheter in the internal jugular vein

Background: Internal jugular venous access is an essential part of patient management in many clinical settings. In the traditional technique, rates of major and minor complications can be as high as 10%. Ultrasound guid...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521011
  • DOI 10.26611/1015928
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar (2019). Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 123-128. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521011