Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: In spite of tremendous advances in contemporary anesthesia practice, airway management continues to be of paramount importance to the anesthesiologist. Hemodynamic changes are the major undesirable consequences of endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy. The supraglottic airway device is a novel device that fills the gap in airway management between tracheal intubation and use of face mask. In view of this, the present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices L MA Proseal and I-gel. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups of 30 each. In Group P (n=30) LMA Proseal and Group I (n=30) I-gel were used respectively. Both the devices were compared in relation to ease of insertion assessed in terms of Modified Lund and Stovener criteria, jaw relaxation based on Young’s criteria, number of attempts for insertion and hemodynamic changes. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data. I-gel was significantly easier to insert than LMA-Proseal (P < 0.05) (Chi-square test). The mean time for insertion was more with Group P (17.80 + 1.69 secs) than with Group I (15.9 + 2.52 secs) (P < 0.05). The success rate of first attempt insertion was more with Group I (P < 0.05). There was siginificant difference in SBP and MAP changes during insertion and after proseal LMA compared with Igel(P<0.001). There was no evidence of airway complications. Sore throat was significantly more evident in Group P. Conclusion: Both LMA Proseal and I-gel can be used safely and effectively in selected patients undergoing general anaesthesia. I-gel is easy to insert compared to LMA Proseal.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

Study of post-operative analgesia after addition of opioids with intravenous regional anesthesia

Background: Intravenous regional anesthesia was first discovered by August Carl Gustav Bier. In 1908 came the first Bier’s paper in “Venous Anesthesia” which was natural outgrowth of his previous work with tourniquet and...

Effect of intravenous dexamethasone on the duration of action of supraclavicular block

Background: Supraclavicular block is a popular and widely employed regional nerve block of the upper extremity. Duration of action and possible variations in it can be a limiting factor for use of this technique. Dexamet...

Comparative study of intrathecal bupivacaine with buprenorphine and bupivacaine with tramadol

Background: Intrathecal local anaesthetic provide adequate sensory and motor block necessary for all infra umbilical surgeries. Aim: The study is to compare Buprenorphine and Tramadol in their efficacy as adjuvants to su...

A double blind, randomized, controlled trial to study the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic and recovery responses during tracheal extubation

Background: Extubation is known to produce significant hemodynamic disturbances. Literature claims that dexmedetomidine, provides excellent cardiovascular stability, no respiratory depression and may be a useful adjunct...

Study of preoperative and intra operative factors associated with post operative mechanical ventilation following elective abdominal surgery

Background: Most severe form of post operative pulmonary complications is acute respiratory failure, a condition in which respiratory system fails in gas exchange function. Unscheduled admission to the ICU is also a prob...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521011
  • DOI 10.26611/1015928
  • Views 157
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar (2019). Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 123-128. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521011