Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia

Journal Title: Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology - Year 2019, Vol 9, Issue 2

Abstract

Background: In spite of tremendous advances in contemporary anesthesia practice, airway management continues to be of paramount importance to the anesthesiologist. Hemodynamic changes are the major undesirable consequences of endotracheal intubation and laryngoscopy. The supraglottic airway device is a novel device that fills the gap in airway management between tracheal intubation and use of face mask. In view of this, the present study was undertaken to compare the performance of two supraglottic airway devices L MA Proseal and I-gel. Methodology: Sixty ASA I-II patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia were randomised into two groups of 30 each. In Group P (n=30) LMA Proseal and Group I (n=30) I-gel were used respectively. Both the devices were compared in relation to ease of insertion assessed in terms of Modified Lund and Stovener criteria, jaw relaxation based on Young’s criteria, number of attempts for insertion and hemodynamic changes. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data. I-gel was significantly easier to insert than LMA-Proseal (P < 0.05) (Chi-square test). The mean time for insertion was more with Group P (17.80 + 1.69 secs) than with Group I (15.9 + 2.52 secs) (P < 0.05). The success rate of first attempt insertion was more with Group I (P < 0.05). There was siginificant difference in SBP and MAP changes during insertion and after proseal LMA compared with Igel(P<0.001). There was no evidence of airway complications. Sore throat was significantly more evident in Group P. Conclusion: Both LMA Proseal and I-gel can be used safely and effectively in selected patients undergoing general anaesthesia. I-gel is easy to insert compared to LMA Proseal.

Authors and Affiliations

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar

Keywords

Related Articles

A comparative study on two doses of clonidine 45mcg Vs 60mcg added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine given intrathecally for infra umbilical surgeries

Background: This study was designed to evaluate the addition of two doses of clonidine ( 45 µg and 60µg) added to hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) 2.75ml in spinal anaesthesia for sub umbilical surgeries. Aim of Study: Time...

Airway management and anaesthesia in maxillofacial trauma

Maxillofacial trauma forms a major part of patients attending emergency department because of the frequency and abundant occurrence. Management of airway is pivotal due to distorted anatomy, urgency of establishing airwa...

A comparative study of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal bupivacain(0.5) heavy with different doses of midazolam(1mg and 2mg) as adjuvant in patients undergoing elective lower limb surgeries

Background: Discovery of spinal receptors like alpha 2 adrenergic, cholinergic, opioid, NMDA and gamma aminobutyricacid(GABA)and benzodiazepine receptors trigger the use of drugs like neostigmine, clonidine, opioids keta...

Anaesthetic management of patient with pheochromocytoma for laparoscopic adrenalectomy

Pheochromocytoma is a neuroendocrine tumor of the medulla of the adrenal glands (originating in the chromaffin cells), or extra-adrenal chromaffin tissue that failed to involute after birth,1 that secretes high amounts o...

Spinal anesthesia as contributing factor to chronic low backache: A myth or reality

Background: Backache is a common health problem affecting people and a major cause of physical, psychological and economical burden for the individual as well as society. The occurrence of low back pain in India is high...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521011
  • DOI 10.26611/1015928
  • Views 163
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ramadas B, Subhash Mashalkar V, Ravi Kumar (2019). Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Proseal and I-gel in patients posted for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia. Medpulse International Journal of Anesthesiology, 9(2), 123-128. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521011