Comparison of radiological and functional outcome in patients with femoral neck fracture operated with dynamic hip screw versus multiple cannulated screws

Journal Title: International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences - Year 2018, Vol 4, Issue 2

Abstract

Introduction: Intracapsular fractures of neck femur have always presented a great challenge to orthopaedics surgeons and remain in many ways the unsolved fracture as far as treatment and results are concerned especially in younger population. Intracapsular fracture neck of femur is regarded as an orthopaedic emergency and needs to be reduced with rigid internal fixation which is believed to improve the circulation of femoral head and prevent the nonunion and avascular necrosis. In our country sliding hip screw is not commonly used for intracapsular neck femur fracture fixation as compared to cannulated screw fixation, we have undertaken this comparative study to assess the outcome of both fixation modalities as well as factors influencing the results of these fixations in our population. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective randomized study conducted at tertiary care hospital in department of Orthopaedics consists of 62 patients which were randomized into 2 groups. Group A(n=31) patients were operated with 3 cannulated cancellous screws and Group B(n=31) patients were operated with Dynamic hip screw. Results: We have found DHS not only to be to be more stable but also allows better compression across the fracture, allowing early mobilization and early union. There was no complication of non-union in patients managed with DHS while 3 patients managed with CC screw progressed to non-union. Average time for union in our study was 14 weeks for patients managed with DHS while it was 18 weeks for patients managed with CC screw. Conclusion: We recommend use of DHS with derotation screw for managing all the patients of fracture neck femur i/v/o early mobilization, early union and reduced risk of non-union.

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. Pravin Londhe, Dr. Hitesh J Mangukiya, Dr. Bhavin Agrawal, Dr. Atul Shrivastava

Keywords

Related Articles

Titanium elastic nailing in shaft femur fracture in paediatric patients

Background: Paediatric shaft femoral fracture can be treated either conservatively or by internal fixation. Complications inherited with cast management and advantages of the intramedullary nailing in long bone fracture,...

A study of efficacy of locking versus dynamic compression plates for diaphyseal forearm fractures

Fractures of the forearm bones may result in severe loss of function unless adequately treated. Severe loss of function may result even though adequate healing of the fracture occurs 1, 4. Fractures of the forearm presen...

Is outcome of delayed fixation comparable with early fixation in type 3 supracondylar humerus fracture in children

Background: Gartland type 3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children have been associated with serious complications and believed to benefit from an emergency treatment. However, several unavoidable factors som...

Comparison of radiological outcome of unstable Intertrochanteric femur fractures in elderly patients treated with Indian and Foreign Cephalomedullary nails

Aim of study: Purpose of study was to compare the radiological outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the patients treated by Indian and Foreign Cephalomedullary nails. Methods: 417 patients aged 65 years and...

Patellar clunk syndrome: A rare cause of painful knee after total knee arthroplasty

Although total knee arthroplasty is a successful procedure, postoperative residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty is still the major factor that contributes to patient dissatisfaction. Even after resurfacing the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP487256
  • DOI 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i2o.150
  • Views 112
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. Pravin Londhe, Dr. Hitesh J Mangukiya, Dr. Bhavin Agrawal, Dr. Atul Shrivastava (2018). Comparison of radiological and functional outcome in patients with femoral neck fracture operated with dynamic hip screw versus multiple cannulated screws. International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences, 4(2), 1040-1048. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-487256