Comparison of the Effects of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Achieved with 0.5% Bupivacaine in Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Maduranthagam

Journal Title: Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research - Year 2015, Vol 3, Issue 8

Abstract

Background & Objectives: Supraclavicular block of brachial plexus provides complete and reliable anesthesia for upper limb surgeries. Bupivacaine is an effective local anesthetic for brachial plexus anesthesia. It provides good sensory and motor blockade. We evaluated the anesthetic quality and length of analgesia with the addition of either Fentanyl or Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine for Supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Methods: In a prospective clinical trial, 90 patients were randomly allocated to either receive 30 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% (Group B), 30 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% with Fentanyl 50 mcg (Group BF) or 30 ml Bupivacaine 0.5% with Dexmedetomidine 50 mcg (Group BD) in Supraclavicular brachial plexus. The characteristics for anesthesia and analgesia were assessed for the three groups. Observations: Demographic profile was comparable in the groups. The onset of analgesia and time to complete analgesia was enhanced in Group BD and Group BF compared to Group B. Prolongation of sensory blockade and motor blockade with extended duration of postoperative analgesia was observed in Group BD and Group BF compared to Group B. There were minimum hemodynamic disturbances and side-effects in any group except for Grade 3 sedation score which was frequently noted in patients receiving Dexmedetomidine as adjunct. Results: Compared to the use of Bupivacaine 0.5%, 30 ml alone for Supraclavicular brachial plexus block, the addition of 50 mcg Fentanyl or 50 mcg Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine enhanced onset of block and also increased duration of surgical anesthesia with prolongation of post-operative analgesia. Furthermore blockade characteristics improved better with addition of Dexmedetomidine than Fentanyl without increasing incidence of unwanted side-effects

Authors and Affiliations

Dr. P. Manohar

Keywords

Related Articles

Locally Aggressive Nasal Polyp Masquerading As A Malignant Mass – A Case Report

Angiomatous nasal polyp (ANP) is a rare entity of inflammatory sinonasal polyp, constituting 4 to 5% of all nasal polyps1,2 . Without knowledge of the typical clinical presentation and the complete study of imaging findi...

A Case of Common Extensor Tendon Tear of Elbow Treated with Platelet Rich Plasma Infiltration

Common Extensor tendinopathy is one of the most common overuse injury of elbow. With the repetitive overload and microtrauma of elbow it may eventually leads to tear of the common extensor tendon that is rare. In this ca...

Comparison of Endometrial Changes in Uterine Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis of Uterus with Correlation of Serum Estradiol and Progesterone Levels

Abstract Background: Both leiomyoma and adenomyosis are commonly encountered gynecological pathologies. It is a well-established fact that hyperestrogenic state is associated with growth of leiomyoma but the exact etiolo...

Spectrum of Thyroid Lesions and its Clinicopathological Correlation – A Two Year Study from A Tertiary Care Centre

Introduction: Thyroid diseases are one of the common endocrine abnormality both in India and worldwide. Clinically apparent thyroid nodules are seen in 4-5 % of population. Majority of thyroid swellings are nonneoplastic...

Precancerous Risk Assessment of the Gastric Atrophy by Tri-modal Endoscopy

Background / Aims: Gastritis staging and detection of pre-neoplastic gastric mucosal changes based on the histology of biopsy specimen imposes a considerable burden on endoscopist and pathologist. Therefore, we attempted...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP212282
  • DOI -
  • Views 87
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Dr. P. Manohar (2015). Comparison of the Effects of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Achieved with 0.5% Bupivacaine in Karpaga Vinayaga Medical College and Hospital, Maduranthagam. Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research, 3(8), 7131-7138. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-212282