Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 5

Abstract

In the sacrificial moral dilemma task, participants have to morally judge an action that saves several lives at the cost of killing one person. According to the dual process corrective model of moral judgment suggested by Greene and collaborators (2001; 2004; 2008), cognitive control is necessary to override the intuitive, deontological force of the norm against killing and endorse the utilitarian perspective. However, a conflict model has been proposed more recently to account for part of the evidence in favor of dual process models in moral and social decision making. In this model, conflict, moral responses and reaction times arise from the interplay between individually variable motivational factors and objective parameters intrinsic to the choices offered. To further explore this model in the moral dilemma task, we confronted three different samples with a set of dilemmas representing an objective gradient of utilitarian pull, and collected data on moral judgment and on conflict in a 4-point scale. Collapsing all cases along the gradient, participants in each sample felt less conflicted on average when they gave extreme responses (1 or 4 in the UR scale). They felt less conflicted on average when responding to either the low- or the high-pull cases. The correlation between utilitarian responses and conflict was positive in the low-pull and negative in the high-pull cases. This pattern of data suggests that moral responses to sacrificial dilemmas are driven by decision conflict, which in turn depends on the interplay between an objective gradient of utilitarian pull and the moral motivations which regulate individual responsiveness to this gradient.

Authors and Affiliations

Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez and David Aguilar-Pardo

Keywords

Related Articles

Criteria for performance evaluation

Using a cognitive task (mental calculation) and a perceptual-motor task (stylized golf putting), we examined differential proficiency using the CWS index and several other quantitative measures of performance. The CWS in...

Anticipated and experienced emotions in environmental risk perception

Affective forecasting with respect to two environmental risks (ozone depletion, air pollution) was investigated by studying tourists who travelled to either Australia or Bangkok and were thus confronted with one of these...

The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses

Abstract: In social interaction, the facial expression of an opponent contains information that may influence the interaction. We asked whether facial expression affects decision-making in the ultimatum game. In this two...

Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals

This study analyzes the relative accuracy of experts, polls, and the so-called ‘fundamentals’ in predicting the popular vote in the four U.S. presidential elections from 2004 to 2016. Although the majority (62%) of 452 e...

Reference-dependent preferences and loss aversion: A discrete choice experiment in the health-care sector

This study employs a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) in the health-care sector to test the loss aversion theory that is derived from reference-dependent preferences: The absolute subjective value of a deviation from a r...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678436
  • DOI -
  • Views 167
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Alejandro Rosas, Juan Pablo Bermúdez and David Aguilar-Pardo (2019). Decision conflict drives reaction times and utilitarian responses in sacrificial dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(5), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678436