DISOBEDIENCE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER: DIFFERENTIATION WITH CIRCUMSTANCES THAT EXCLUDE THE CRIME OF THE ACT
Journal Title: Вісник Запорізького національного університету. Юридичні науки - Year 2017, Vol 4, Issue
Abstract
The article deals with the qualification of crimes against the established order of military service under art. 402 “Disobedience” and art. 403 “Failure to comply with the order” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the delimitation of the circumstances precluding criminality, namely: Emergency and execution of the order or orders. The author examines the problem of criminal charges of crimes against the established order of military service provided for in art. 402 “Disobedience” and art. 403 “Failure to comply with the order” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the delimitation of the circumstances precluding criminality in practice. The practical significance of the results is the recommendations and proposals on the perfection of the current criminal law, strengthening the mechanism of its effectiveness, appropriate use of it in practice, and further development of the theoretical basis for solving this problem. Recommendations for results are as follows: for proper separation and legal qualification of these crimes, one should reliably and accurately determine whether the soldier was one against the other in a relationship of subordination to military service; an attitude, which has matured to the consequences and the period had been committed criminal offenses and whether there are circumstances precluding criminality stipulated in art. 39 and art. 41 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. By its legal nature execute a lawful order – a person performs their legal duties. Failure to fulfil this order, its failure or improper performance of an offense, including an offense (for example, a military criminal liability for insubordination (art. 402 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), and failure to order (art. 403 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)). As for punishment, then based on the principles of justice and humanity of each court determines the measure of punishment for a crime that matches the seriousness of the committed criminal offense (crime), which is necessary and sufficient for its amendment, the subject of preventing the commission of new crimes and complies with the law of criminal liability.
Authors and Affiliations
A. A. Konova, O. V. Kosyak
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP439474
- DOI -
- Views 52
- Downloads 0
CONTRACT IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION RELATIONS: SOME FEATURES OF CIVIL REGULATION
The article is devoted to the consideration of сivil aspects of regulation of contractual relations in information sphere, the characteristics of their types and features, the specificity of legal facts, on the basis of...
ПОЛІЦЕЙСЬКІ ЗАХОДИ ПАТРУЛЬНОЇ ПОЛІЦІЇ
Стаття присвячена дослідженню механізму застосування превентивних і примусових заходів патрульної поліції України, їх детальному розкриттю і співвідношенню в умовах сьогоденної реформи правоохоронної системи України. Про...
ПРОКУРОР ЯК СУБ’ЄКТ ЦИВІЛЬНО-ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНИХ ПРАВОВІДНОСИН
Стаття присвячена актуальним питанням реформування органів прокуратури, зміни спрямованості вектора її діяльності з площини загального нагляду, забезпечення захисту прав та інтересів осіб у площину кримінальної юстиції,...
TAX SYSTEMS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES: NOTES TO THE SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION
Due to the fact that Ukraine chose a course on European integration, the adjustment of the tax system of our country should be made taking into account the requirements of the European space, principles of the constructi...
OMBUDSMAN IN THE MECHANISM OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION IN UKRAINE: SEARCH FOR AN EFFECTIVE MODEL IN THE CONTEXT OF FOREIGN EXPERIENCE ADOPTION
The article studies the legal nature of ombudsman as an important institute of human rights which is intended to contribute to the protection of human and civil rights. The research is based on the analysis of basic mode...