DISOBEDIENCE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER: DIFFERENTIATION WITH CIRCUMSTANCES THAT EXCLUDE THE CRIME OF THE ACT

Abstract

The article deals with the qualification of crimes against the established order of military service under art. 402 “Disobedience” and art. 403 “Failure to comply with the order” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the delimitation of the circumstances precluding criminality, namely: Emergency and execution of the order or orders. The author examines the problem of criminal charges of crimes against the established order of military service provided for in art. 402 “Disobedience” and art. 403 “Failure to comply with the order” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the delimitation of the circumstances precluding criminality in practice. The practical significance of the results is the recommendations and proposals on the perfection of the current criminal law, strengthening the mechanism of its effectiveness, appropriate use of it in practice, and further development of the theoretical basis for solving this problem. Recommendations for results are as follows: for proper separation and legal qualification of these crimes, one should reliably and accurately determine whether the soldier was one against the other in a relationship of subordination to military service; an attitude, which has matured to the consequences and the period had been committed criminal offenses and whether there are circumstances precluding criminality stipulated in art. 39 and art. 41 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. By its legal nature execute a lawful order – a person performs their legal duties. Failure to fulfil this order, its failure or improper performance of an offense, including an offense (for example, a military criminal liability for insubordination (art. 402 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), and failure to order (art. 403 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine)). As for punishment, then based on the principles of justice and humanity of each court determines the measure of punishment for a crime that matches the seriousness of the committed criminal offense (crime), which is necessary and sufficient for its amendment, the subject of preventing the commission of new crimes and complies with the law of criminal liability.

Authors and Affiliations

A. A. Konova, O. V. Kosyak

Keywords

Related Articles

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ASSOCIATION IN PROFESSIONAL UNITS: LEGAL REGULATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FOREIGN EXPERIENCE

The article deals with the problems of legal regulation that arise in the process of implementing the constitutional right to unite in trade unions in Ukraine. A comprehensive analysis of the constitutional principles of...

THEORETICAL AND LEGAL BASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EXPORT-IMPORT TRANSACTIONS IN UKRAINE

As of today, foreign economic activity is becoming one of the most important elements of the Ukrainian economy. The implementation of this activity requires proper legal regulation by the state. At the same time, Ukraine...

DISOBEDIENCE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER: DIFFERENTIATION WITH CIRCUMSTANCES THAT EXCLUDE THE CRIME OF THE ACT

The article deals with the qualification of crimes against the established order of military service under art. 402 “Disobedience” and art. 403 “Failure to comply with the order” of the Criminal Code of Ukraine and the d...

TO THE ISSUE OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF EUROPEAN STANDARDS FOR APATRIDS IN THE PRIVATIZATION PROCESS

In the article are considered the civil status of apatrids as potential subjects of privatization according of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the established practice of th...

КЛАСИФІКАЦІЯ ЮРИДИЧНИХ ОСІБ ЯК СУБ’ЄКТІВ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОГО ПРАВА В АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВІЙ ДОКТРИНІ: ПОШУК БАЗОВОГО КРИТЕРІЮ

У статті під кутом зору сучасних тенденцій розвитку адміністративно-правової науки та думок вчених-адміністративістів з приводу порушеної проблематики окреслено основні критерії класифікації юридичних осіб у системі суб’...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP439474
  • DOI -
  • Views 67
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

A. A. Konova, O. V. Kosyak (2017). DISOBEDIENCE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE ORDER: DIFFERENTIATION WITH CIRCUMSTANCES THAT EXCLUDE THE CRIME OF THE ACT. Вісник Запорізького національного університету. Юридичні науки, 4(), 109-115. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-439474