Does Early Egg Consumption Reduce Egg Allergy? Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials

Journal Title: Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) - Year 2019, Vol 14, Issue 2

Abstract

We refer to the six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (PETIT; Natsume et al, HEAP; Bellach et al, BEAT; Tan et al and STEP; Palmer et al, EAT; Perkin et al, STAR; Palmer et al, published within the last five years. These trials reported on early egg introduction and risk of later egg sensitization and egg allergy at 12 months of age. Based on these trial results, it is clear that RCT results need to be critically appraised and interpreted. We found that the methodological differences among the studies may have influenced the study results. Therefore, critical interpretation of RCT results is required to understand the evidence. We refer to the six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) PETIT; Natsume et al. [1], HEAP; Bellach et al. [2], BEAT; Tan et al. [3] and STEP; Palmer et al. [4], EAT; Perkin et al. [5], STAR; Palmer et al. [6] published within the last five years. The trials reported on early egg introduction and risk of later egg sensitisation and allergy at 12 months of age. Although these six trials were very similar in several respects, we have concerns regarding the consistency of the findings. The Japanese PETIT trial was the only one to find a protective effect for egg allergy diagnosed using oral food challenge testing (OFC). Although the EAT and STAR trials concluded that early introduction of egg was protective against food allergy, neither showed good evidence on OFC testing. In terms of sensitisation, the BEAT trial found reduced sensitisation when whole egg was introduced to high risk infants. The STEP and HEAP found no protection for either sensitisation or food allergy. RCTs provide the highest level of evidence for a causal effect from an intervention [7]. However, belief in the RCT as a study design may lead to the results being accepted as unarguable evidence and a failure to critically appraise individual studies. This can lead to confusion when similar RCTs present conflicting results as is the case here. There are several methodological differences between the studies which may have influenced the results. PETIT was based on high risk children in Japan. The other studies on high allergy risk populations, the BEAT, STEP and STAR, all used Australian birth cohorts, and the allergy risk was defined differently. In the BEAT study, high risk was defined as any immediate family member (father, mother, older sibs) with food allergy, asthma, atopic eczema or allergic rhinitis. In STEP it was based on the “atopic status” of the mother only (medically diagnosed allergic disease with sensitisation to at least one common aero allergen), and results were adjusted for paternal allergic disease. The STAR trial recruited babies with severe eczema. In all three trials the intervention was similar (whole egg) and, all assessed the outcome at 12 months. However, the intervention timing and duration differed. In STAR and BEAT the intervention began at 4 and ended at 8 months with a duration of 4 months. In STEP, the intervention began at 4.5- 6 months continuing until 10 months with a variable duration of 4.5-6 months. They also differed with respect to analysis. Although both BEAT and STEP provided an intention-to-treat analysis, STEP adjusted for baseline factors which appeared different between the groups while BEAT controlled only for region of origin of parents. All 3 trials may have been underpowered (Table 1). The STEP trial which reportedly failed to reach the planned sample size was almost twice the sample size of BEAT and 10 times the size of STAR.

Authors and Affiliations

Nilakshi T Waidyatillake, John A Burgess, Caroline J lodge

Keywords

Related Articles

Personalized Individual Parent Training (PIPT) Parenting Intervention

Parent training is the treatment of choice for children with oppositional problems and known to be very effective for reducing behavioural problems. It also increases sensitive responding the primary mechanism for increa...

Diversity and Characterization of Mushrooms from District Haripur, KPK, Pakistan

During the present study total of 19 families including 40 species were recorded enlisted in Table 1. The highest number of wild edible mushroom species recorded was of the Pleurotaceae family (Pleurotus pulmonarius, P....

Improving Quality of Life among Stroke Patients with Dysphagia: A Case Report

Dysphagia is a disorder that includes any dysfunction from chewing in the mouth to the passage of the bolus into the oesophagus [1]. In the United States, 50%-75% of nursing home residents are estimated as having dysphag...

Factors Contributing to Low Productivity and Food Insecurity in Bungoma County, Kenya

Food insecurity within households is a risk to people’s livelihoods. If not addressed in good time it could results into a disaster that will require foreign intervention for that affected communit...

Recent Advances on Tunable Vortex Beam Devices for Biomedical Applications

The optical vortex beams carrying orbital angular momentum (OAM) recently have unveiled great potential to be widely applied in advanced biomedicine, e.g. manipulating and assembling DNA, detecting biomolecule, organic i...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP594319
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.14.002526
  • Views 154
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Nilakshi T Waidyatillake, John A Burgess, Caroline J lodge (2019). Does Early Egg Consumption Reduce Egg Allergy? Evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 14(2), 10554-10558. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-594319