DYNAMICS OF VARIATION IN ACCUSATIVE SINGULAR INANIMATE NOMINAL FORMS IN THE STANDARD-ORIENTED REGIONAL UKRAINIAN OF THE 19TH–21ST CENTURIES

Abstract

The paper studies the diatopic variation in use of the two forms of inanimate nominal forms in accusative singular for masculine declension in Ukrainian. The variation in question involves two forms: the one coinciding with nominative (which is the default standard way for inanimate nouns in East Slavic) and coinciding with genitive (according to the pattern attested normally with animate nouns). The degree of this variation (viz. the presence of Accusative = Genitive for inanimates) is different in literary texts created in different regions of Ukraine. The study is based on the General Regionally Annotated Corpus of Ukrainian (GRAC, uacorpus.org) that contains about 190 million tokens of standard-oriented literary representing all the regions of Ukraine since the beginning of the 19th century until the latest decades. This diatopical diversity is partly due to the dialectal diversity of the Ukrainian language that underlies the standard-oriented language. Notably in the 19th century regional standard subnorms, different from the ones developing in Kyiv and Kharkiv regions, existed in Western Ukraine (Halychyna and Bukovyna); after the World War II a certain convergence between these subnorms was achieved, without however eliminating all the diversity. In Western Ukrainan dialects the variation in question is absent; correspondingly it was virtually missing in the corpus of the pre-1918 Ukrainain prose created in the territory of the then Austro-Hungary. After 1945 and the incorporation of Halychyna and Bukovyna to Soviet Ukraine the use of this form grows drastically in the texts created in these regions, first by the authors from the other regions who had migrated to the West, and later by the authors who themselves hail from Lviv and other regions. In other Ukrainian regions the frequency of the variation increases in the periods of the active development of the literary language (1917-1933 and after 1991).

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Shvedova

Keywords

Related Articles

ROLE OF GAYATRI SPIVAK’S DE-TRANSLATION APPROACH IN REPRESENTATION OF MAHASWETA DEVI’S SIGNATURE STYLE (EXEMPLIFIED BY SPIVAK’S TRANSLATION OF DEVI’S “STANADAYINI”)

A meticulous reader and committed translator of philosopher Jacques Derrida, Gayatri Spivak introduced her interpretation of Derrida’s form of philosophical and literary analysis called deconstruction. Explications of th...

PAROEMIA DENOTING “HAPPINESS” IN LINGUISTIC VIEW OF GERMAN NATION

The article examines key notions of modern linguistics: national language picture of the world, national-cultural specificity of linguistic units and proverbs, which define the notion “happiness” in the language picture...

TRANSFORMATION OF EMOTIONALITY AND EMOTIVITY EXPRESSION IN HORROR GENRE: LINGVOSEMIOTIC ASPECT

In the context of new multimodal perspective, that is currently being explored by leading scholars in the field of linguistics, there is a statement that all types of information transmission are inalienable for the comm...

MULTI-FACETED CONCEPTS OF TIME AND SPACE (THE CASE STUDY OF “FALLEN” BY KATE LAUREN)

The article touches upon the contents, structure and development of the concepts TIME and SPACE in the novel “Fallen” by Kate Lauren; it is aimed at revealing some specific ways these basic ontological categories are rea...

THE LEADING MOTIVES OF CORNELIA FUNKE’S CREATIVE WRITING

The article analyzes the peculiarities of the creative writing of an outstanding German writer Cornelia Funke, the author of more than forty works for children and young people, the laureate of the number of prestigious...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP634988
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Maria Shvedova (2018). DYNAMICS OF VARIATION IN ACCUSATIVE SINGULAR INANIMATE NOMINAL FORMS IN THE STANDARD-ORIENTED REGIONAL UKRAINIAN OF THE 19TH–21ST CENTURIES. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: “Лінгвістика”, 31(), 88-94. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-634988