Economic evaluation of monoclonal antibody in the management of colorectal cancer

Journal Title: Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy - Year 2013, Vol 1, Issue 1

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the cost of colorectal cancer (CRC) management and compare the cost effectiveness of cetuximab and bevacizumab in the management of CRC. Method: This economic evaluation study from a societal perspective involves collecting resource utilization data based on the clinical pathway of colorectal cancer management. The cost calculated includes drugs, human resources, administrative, investigations as well as capital cost. Patient’s cost was also calculated based on an interview with colorectal cancer patients. Effectiveness estimates for monoclonal antibody (cetuximab and bevacizumab) treatment were modeled from study respondents based on references from other studies. Results: Cost of treating a case of colorectal cancer in stage I is RM13,623 (RM12,467-RM14,777), stage II RM19,753 (RM16,734-RM23,520), stage III RM24,972 (RM20,291-RM29,654) and stage IV RM27, 163 (RM23, 192-RM31,133). Cost of CRC management increase with the increasing stage of the disease (Kruskal Wallis, X2=106, p<0.001). Based on estimates of 2671 new cases of CRC, the incremental cost of cetuximab is RM20, 556 480 and bevacizumab is RM7,557,953 at 50% stage III and IV as compared to the conventional chemotherapy. The incremental cost per quality adjusted life years gained for cetuximab is RM38,869 and RM14,290 for bevacizumab. Although both types of monoclonal antibody are considered cost effective (based on WHO guidelines of less than three times of GDP), bevacizumab is considered more cost effective than cetuximab. Cost effectiveness was sensitive to the percentage of late stages of CRC. Conclusions: Cost of treating late stage of CRC is high and bevacizumab are more cost effective compared to cetuximab in the management of the late stage of CRC.

Authors and Affiliations

Ezat SW, Natrah MS, Aljunid S, Rizal MA, Saperi S, Ismail S, Fuad I, Azrif MA

Keywords

Related Articles

Contributions of stochastic events to biological evolution and cancer

Stochastic genetic and epigenetic events have been fundamental in contributing to the development of manifold life-forms, past and present. The development of malignant cell clones and the role of stochasticity as a driv...

Pharmacological and safety evaluation of CIGB-300, a casein kinase 2 inhibitor peptide, administered intralesionally to patients with cervical cancer stage IB2/II

CIGB-300 is a pro-apoptotic casein kinase 2 inhibitor peptide with potential anticancer action. An open-label and dose scaling Phase I trial was carried out to investigate the peptide tumor uptake, pharmacokinetics, toxi...

Current trends and controversies in the management of patients with splenic flexure tumours

Aim: There exists a variation in practice in the management of tumours around the splenic flexure. We aim to determine the current opinion regarding the management of these tumours. Methods: An anonymised 10-part online...

Pseudocystic pheochromocytoma: An incidental finding and a rare entity

Cystic adrenal neoplasms are uncommon and may be incidentally discovered during radiologic procedure not directly performed for the evaluation of adrenal disease. Cystic pheochromocytomas are uncommon neoplasms that orig...

Clinical study of the treatment of multiple brain metastases from adenocarcinoma of the lung by simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Objective: To investigate the effects of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB) and sequential boost conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in treatment of multiple brain metastases from lung adenocar...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP549497
  • DOI 10.14312/2052-4994.2013-5
  • Views 60
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ezat SW, Natrah MS, Aljunid S, Rizal MA, Saperi S, Ismail S, Fuad I, Azrif MA (2013). Economic evaluation of monoclonal antibody in the management of colorectal cancer. Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy, 1(1), 34-39. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-549497