Efficiency index of a pedaling monitor system depend on load power, cadence and body weight
Journal Title: Journal of Science and Cycling - Year 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2
Abstract
Background: In recent years, a variety of power meters for bicycles has become commercially available (Allen & Coggan, 2010: Training and Racing with a Power Meter (2nd edn.). Boulder, Velopress). In particular, a pedaling monitoring system (SGY-PM900H90, SGX-CA900: Pioneer Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan) is a device that displays a pedaling force vector to decompose the tangential and normal direction of pedaling force (Pioneer Cyclesports, “Pedaling Monitor Sensor”. Retrieved 20 March, 2014, from http://pioneer-cyclesports.com/us-en/). No other such devices exist except for those used experimentally. This device can display the efficiency index of the pedaling force. Although we can see the pedaling force vector diagram and the efficiency index change every second, it is difficult to understand the state of the averaged pedaling force vectors (Bibbo et al., 2008: A wireless integrated system to evaluate efficiency indexes in real time during cycling, 4th European Conference of the IFMBE Proceedings, 22: 89–92). Purpose: The purpose of this study was to reveal the influence of load power, cadence, and body weight on the efficiency index of the pedaling monitor system by averaging the pedaling force vector signal obtained from the pedaling monitor system over a measuring period. Methods: Twenty-eight participants were given the pedaling load step up from ~150 W to ~300 W by a bicycle trainer (Powerbeam Pro-trainer: CycleOps, Madison, WI). The pedaling force vectors during the step load were recorded. Cadence was not specified: each participant had decided on a comfortable cadence. Using a pedaling force vector obtained from the experiment, the pedaling force vector was averaged at each load step, and the efficiency index was determined from the averaged pedaling force vector. Multiple regression analysis was conducted with the efficiency index as an objective variable, and load power, cadence, and body weight were set as explanatory variables. Results: The efficiency index was significantly correlated (multiple correlation coefficient: r = 0.732, p-value = 4.6 x10-21) with load power (regression coefficient: = 0.078%, p = 3.2 x10-16), cadence (= -0.429%, p = 2.0 x10-10), and body weight (= -0.383%, p = 1.4x10-7). Using the coefficient value of the multiple regression analysis, the efficiency index was compensated to remove the effects of these factors (load power, cadence, and body weight). As a result, the average compensated efficiency index was 50.2% at 250 W, 100 rpm, 65 kg, and the standard deviation was 5.2%. Discussion: The result was considered to be due to the influence of the load effect, which was applied to the pedal by centrifugal force and gravity of the leg weight. The variation in the compensated efficiency index was small, after removing the effects of load power, cadence, and body weight. It was considered that the features of pedaling of the participant were reflected in the compensated efficiency index. According to the actual pedaling force vector, the effect of downward force in the recovery phase was large. Conclusion: In order to reveal the influence of load power, cadence, and body weight on the efficiency index of the pedaling force vector, multiple regression analysis was made with the efficiency index calculated from the averaged pedaling force vector. As a result, the following became clear: (1) the efficiency index can be compensated to remove the effects of these factors (load power, cadence, and body weight), and (2) it is possible to understand the features of the participant's pedaling technique from the compensated efficiency index.
Authors and Affiliations
T Kitawaki| Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Shikata, Okayama, Japan, T Tokuyasu| Faculty of Information Engineering, Fukuoka institute of technology, Fukuoka, Japan, H Oka| Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Shikata, Okayama, Japan
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP2853
- DOI -
- Views 418
- Downloads 25
Effects of changing seat height on bike handling
Background: According to the Statistical Release by the Department for Transport, in the United Kingdom 19.000 cyclists are killed or seriously injured every year, with losing control being one of the most common reasons...
The effects of cycling cleat position on subsequent running performance in a simulated duathlon
Strategies that reduce the physiological load during the cycling phase of triathlon events may enable athletes to perform better during the subsequent running phase. The current study examines the effects of changes in s...
Foot Pain and Cycling: a survey of frequency, type, location, associations and amelioration of foot pain
The foot – pedal interface is the primary site for energy transfer from the cyclist to the bicycle, with anecdotal evidence that foot injuries from cycling are common. However, there is little research regarding the prev...
An analysis of participation and performance by nationality at ‘Ironman Switzerland’ from 1995 to 2011
Triathlon, in particular the ‘Ironman’ distance, has become very popular in the field of ultra-endurance sports. The aim of the present study was to analyse the participation and performances at the ‘Ironman Switzerland’...
Physiological and performance characteristics of road, mountain bike and BMX cyclists
The purpose of this research was to quantify several physiological and power output characteristics of high-performance road, cross-country mountain bike (XCMB), downhill mountain bike (DHMB) and bicycle motocross (BMX)...