Ethical Justifi cations of the Public Participation Principle
Journal Title: International Journal of Contemporary Management - Year 2010, Vol 9, Issue 2
Abstract
This article discusses some ethical arguments in favour of public participation. It analyses logical structures of the arguments, their assumptions, practical consequences in management and logical limits. The article assumes that public participation is a fact and the principle of action. The fact of public participation consists in the voluntary participation of community members in managing its affairs. The principle of public participation requires the willingness to respect the will of members of a society in decisions concerning the community to which they belong. The article investigates ethical justifi cations of public participation understood as a principle of action. The analysis of the article shows that public participation is ethically justified when it has its basis in law (a legalistic argument), it is wanted by members of a society (a consensual argument), it is useful for the community – it minimises the risk of harmful social conflicts and abuses of power (a rule-utilitarian argument), it is consistent with human nature (an anthropological argument), it is a prerequisite for fair management of social issues (an axiological argument) and it is necessary for respecting human dignity (a personalistic argument). The article indicates some logical limits of the above arguments. As it shows beyond these limits the arguments can be abused in misinterpretation or manipulation, for example when one overlooks some relevant circumstances of participation or commits logical errors in reasoning. The use of the arguments discussed here requires a large number of logical assumptions and identification of a specific situation, which is usually very complex. Therefore, the above arguments require, in addition to extensive knowledge and skills of effective thinking, cognitive sensitivity to the specific circumstances that Aristotle called prudence, and especially – intellectual honesty, which he called „right reason” („orthos logos”).
Authors and Affiliations
Jan Jacko
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP57863
- DOI -
- Views 142
- Downloads 0
Rola klastrów gospodarczych w budowaniu kultury innowacyjności przedsiębiorstw i regionu
Opracowanie ukazuje rolę klastrów gospodarczych w procesie tworzenia kultury innowacyjności. Wskazane zostały zalety klastrów jako miejsca sprzyjającego prowadzeniu działalności innowacyjnej. Przedstawiono również przykł...
Generational Intermentoring as a method of dealing with the consequences of an ageing society in organizations
The paper presents the problem of ageing and its consequences for organizational life along with the results of the research conducted on the sample of 300 employees from three groups: below 35 years old, above 50 years...
Coaching. The Main Mistakes and Threats
The article describes the main mistakes and threats of coaching and also these aspects of coaching that hinder the eff ectiveness and increase its psychological and economic cost. Based on research on efficient coaching...
Competency Model as a Tool of Human Resources Management in Public Administration
Efficient and effective task realisation in local offices of public administration depends on a suitable competency model corresponding to requirements of an organisation and environment. It is due to the fact that nowad...
Główne błędy i zagrożenia w coachingu
Prezentowany tekst porusza problematykę podstawowych błędów i zagrożeń towarzyszących coachingowi, czyli tych aspektów, które obniżają efektywność procesu i podnoszą psychologiczne oraz ekonomiczne koszty jego realizacji...