Evaluating the quality of training courses: a comparison of different designs for evaluating training

Journal Title: ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies - Year 2009, Vol 2, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper aims to show that some designs for evaluating training are more suitable than others in a quality approach. Effectively, several practices of evaluation are incompatible. These are presented in the first section: Kirkpatrick’s fourlevel training evaluation model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior and Results), Kraiger’s comprehensive model based on learning outcomes, as well as the more recent designs taking into account multiple stakeholder perceptions (Michalski & Cousins). On the basis of these works and of some original practices, we attempt to show the aspects which are the most adapted to a total quality approach.

Authors and Affiliations

Isabelle GILLET| Enseignants-chercheurs, Université de Bourgogne Pôle Apprentissages Acquisitions Formation Education, Dijon, France, SPMS, Daniel GILIBERT*| Enseignants-chercheurs, Université de Bourgogne Pôle Apprentissages Acquisitions Formation Education, Dijon, France, SPMS

Keywords

Related Articles

The web sphere of #CharlieHebdo: a network and discours analysis of a political controversy on Twitter

Our paper applies an innovative method combining network and disours analysis on a big sample of tweets posted at the moment of the attack against Charlie Hebdo. Our study contradict, at least partially, the idea that...

The man, the machine and the sacred: when the virtual reality reenchants the world

The rationality associated with the technical progress were able to let believe that the world became disillusioned. Now, far from disillusioning the world, certain technical devices reveal the sacred dimension inherent...

Breastfeeding: semiotic analysis and éducommunicationnelle approach. Handling the meanings and performative acts

Our contribution aims to describe the value system carried by a particular practice what consumption breastfeeding and through communication campaigns, including posters. Our results lead us first to introduce the link...

Are Brands Postmodern Relics? Taking a Closer Look at New Sacred Objects

Ever since the Church lost its monopoly on the sacred, no longer able to solely determine its form or contents, the social sphere has gradually taken over this value, applying it to new human and social objects. As a r...

Technological mediations in the city: from a notion of augmented urban space to the construction of a sense of connectedness by the collective experience

This paper presents a contribution to the research on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for the construction and share of urban experience. We illustrate our considerations with examples that combine...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP9027
  • DOI -
  • Views 431
  • Downloads 24

How To Cite

Isabelle GILLET, Daniel GILIBERT* (2009). Evaluating the quality of training courses: a comparison of different designs for evaluating training. ESSACHESS - Journal for Communication Studies, 2(1), 41-52. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-9027