Evidence and Proving in Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Measurement

Abstract

The article deals with the conceptual problems of proof under the existing Code of Criminal Procedure and the corresponding generalizations made aimed at improving his means in criminal proceedings. The current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, in pursuance of requirements of the Council of Europe, changed the whole “ideology” and the legal paradigm of criminal justice oriented the best world samples. But these changes, as has been repeatedly pointed out by leading scientists, pointing to the famous shortcomings of the CPC 2012 and a certain inertia of consciousness a considerable part of law enforcement officials, have caused a number of problems, not only of enforcement, which are the unregulated, conflicting or debatable, and – methodological associated with a new theoretical interpretation known in the science of criminal trial and criminalistics institutions requiring a corresponding scientific practical study. Among them, the central place belongs to the theory of evidence. Based the marked, the purpose of the article was the conceptual analysis of the current legal paradigm of evidence and of proof, as well as their reflection in the existing criminal procedural legislation. Historically speaking, based on domestic legislative acts, starting with the “Russian Truth”, “Pskov Judicial Charter”, Lithuanian statutes, collections of Magdeburg law, “Rights, which is suing the Little Russian people”, the legislative acts of the Russian empire XVIII-XIX centuries, the Regulation Charter of the criminal justice in 1864 the various types of evidence have been analyzed: indications of the parties and witnesses, written documents, physical evidence and the like. And also summarizes the rules of work with them: the gathering, evaluation and use. Separately, was investigated the issue of evidence with regard to Ukrainian criminal procedure legislation in 1922, 1927, 1958, 1960 in which the concept of procedural sources of evidence has been fixed which include: testimony of a witness, the victim's testimony, the testimony of the suspect, the testimony of the accused, expert evidence, physical evidence, records of investigative and judicial actions, protocols with relevant applications, compiled by authorized bodies as a result of operational search activities, and other documents. A significant part of the article was devoted to a detailed analysis of problems of proof in the acting Code of Criminal Procedure. On the basis of this drew relevant lessons. For Evidence and proofs have the same cognitive nature, and differ only in the procedural status. During a the preliminary investigation, to clearly define the properties (identity, admissibility, reliability and sufficiency) of collected factual data (future proof), is problematic. Therefore, at the pretrial stage investigation is advisable to apply lexical phrases like: “factual data (circumstances)", “information contained in the statement,” “information obtained from during the study of things, documents, material traces of the crime”, “information relevant for establishing the circumstances of the criminal offense “and others. It is only in judicial proceedings is permissible to use the term “evidence” or “forensic evidence”.

Authors and Affiliations

В. Г. Лукашевич

Keywords

Related Articles

Ukrainian society legal mentality as a factor of lawmaking

The article is devoted to the theoretical and legal analysis of the Ukrainian society legal mentality as a factor of law-making. Attention is drawn to the reflection of the legal mentality of Ukrainian society in law-mak...

The main characteristics of the liberal, socialist, Marxist and conservative philosophical and legal interpretations of the property that formed in the New Times

The article analyzes the basic philosophical and legal, liberal, socialist, Marxist and conservative conceptual approaches to understanding the nature of the property, which were formed during the period New Times and we...

Requirements to mediators involved in the decision of a public-law disputes

This article analyzes the requirements that apply to the person who wants to become a media- tor who deals with public-law disputes. Considered the peculiarities of age qualification, degree of education, professional t...

The grounds and procedure for obtaining international legal assistance in the investigation of tax evasion of a transnational nature

The article is devoted to the study of the specificity of obtaining international legal aid in the investigation of tax evasion of a transnational nature. The essence of international legal aid is revealed. The grounds f...

Prerequisites for reforming the administrative and legal support of public management in Ukraine in the process of European integration

The article analyzes the preconditions for reforming the administrative and legal provision of public management in Ukraine. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of public management is particularly relevant in the...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP446484
  • DOI -
  • Views 101
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

В. Г. Лукашевич (2016). Evidence and Proving in Criminal Procedure and Criminalistic Measurement. Держава та регіони. Серія: Право, 1(), 74-79. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-446484