Examining the jurisprudential ruling on the prohibition of keeping books of deviation

Journal Title: فقه و اصول - Year 2016, Vol 47, Issue 103

Abstract

The prohibition of keeping some books referred to as ‘books of deviation’ has been included in books of jurisprudence since the past to the present. The definition of deviation (and conformity) and misguidance (and guidance) in the language of jurists is not so clear; however, when speaking about the prohibition of keeping (or of its destruction), they mean prevention from hearing (and getting informed) of other sayings; and the evidence raised in this regard also combines the two positions of hearing (and getting informed) and following, apparently based on the assumption that there is an association between hearing (and getting informed) and following, and if hearing is prevented, following will certainly be abandoned in consequence. As a result, firstly, the claimed evidences fail to prove a mandate relating to prevention from hearing; secondly, mixing the two positions is not permitted since mere hearing does not lead to following and there is no association between them. Finally, because of the existence of the Qur’an itself as a ‘congregation of words’ scripture, leaving to humans the task of selecting and following the best among the different sayings, with no coercion in this field, and due to the existence of ‘the best of words’ (God’s word) in the Qur’an as the standard criterion, discussion of destruction of the book or of the prohibition of its literal hearing would be meaningless.

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Keshavarz, Mohammad Taghi Fakhlaee

Keywords

Related Articles

Intellect and its Application in Fayḍ Kāshānī’s Jurisprudential Thought

Given the importance of intellect in inference, especially in new issues, it is befitting to study the jurists’ works, such as examining the jurisprudential mode of life (sīra) of Fayḍ Kāshānī as an influential jurist in...

Shī‘ī Versified Jurisprudence in the Last two Centuries

One of the methods of the past scholars for better and faster learning of sciences has been the versification of scientific material. This type of poetry is called ta‘līmī (didactic) in technical terms. Many scholarly ma...

A Research on the Role of Ijtahād in Discernment of the Objects of Rulings

In the process of inferring legal rulings, as discussion about the ruling is essential, the discussion and examination of the "object of ruling" and what is involved in determining this object is also indispensable. The...

Legal-Juridical Study of Conditional Option in Unilateral Obligation

In civil law, khiyārāt (options or rights of withdrawal) is a topic concerning contracts. Also, in article 456 of civil law, khiyār is viewed as related to transactions. In statuary jurisprudence and law, there is little...

Allusion of Words to Meaning from the Viewpoint of legal Theorists and Linguistics

Language consists of two components of word (lafẓ) and “meaning” and the consolidated relation between word and meaning causes human mind to be transferred from the notion of lafẓ to the notion of “meaning”. The nature,...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP190667
  • DOI 10.22067/fiqh.v47i23.27558
  • Views 77
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ali Keshavarz, Mohammad Taghi Fakhlaee (2016). Examining the jurisprudential ruling on the prohibition of keeping books of deviation. فقه و اصول, 47(103), 119-141. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-190667