Federaliści i rozłam między klasycznością a modernością
Journal Title: Ruch Filozoficzny - Year 2014, Vol 71, Issue 1
Abstract
The article shows how the classical political thinking, based on civic virtues, and modernist thinking, based on individualism and self-interest, formed the basis of the U.S. Constitution. The Founding Fathers did not realize the full extent of the rift between classicism and modernity. When, as a result of intellectual discussions and practice of social life, this divide began to become more and more obvious, there has been a transition from the classical to the modernist paradigm in American politics. However, the dispute between classicism and modernity still continues and takes on new forms. On the one hand, contemporary political thinking is seen as a triumph of modernism, in which the individual strives for self-interest, seeks pleasures and desires power; on the other hand, this triumph is disputed by the postmodern attempt to introduce a new non-classical ethical discourse into the political mainstream. As a result of the postmodern influence, based on the concepts of difference, diversity and deconstruction, we can witness today the weakening of Western civilization. The initial project to build a political society based on civic virtues and individualist ambitions, to which the American Founding Fathers aspired, turned out to be misguided. As a solution to today’s problems, the author proposes a return to the modal tradition of the West and the recognition of virtues as the basis for action, in short, a creative return to the philosophical origins of the West.
Authors and Affiliations
Włodzimierz Julian Korab-Karpowicz
Adam Smith on Institutions for Instruction
Adam Smith’s remarks concerning education and its institutions, though they occupy no significant place in his works, are, in fact, deeply grounded in his theory. The philosopher criticized teachers’ fixed salaries assum...
L’influence de la langue et de la culture sur l’être humain sur l’exemple du profil relationnel de l’homme dans Le volontaire et l’involontaire de Paul Ricoeur
The paper attempts to outline the mutual impact between philosophy and linguistics on the example of an analysis of a text entitled Le volontaire et l’involontairewritten by a French philosopher Paul Ricoeur. The researc...
Substance and Person: Berkeley on Descartes and Locke
In his post-1720 works, Berkeley focuses his comments about Descartes on mechanism and about Locke on general abstract ideas. He warns against using metaphysical principles to explain observed regularities, and he extend...
Levinas i Husserl: transcendentalna intersubiektywność
Artykuł ten jest porównaniem koncepcji Innego u Levinasa i transcendentalnej intersubiektywności Husserla. W obu tych filozofiach relacje międzypodmiotowe odgrywają istotną rolę w identyfikacji transcendentalnej podstawy...
Kazimierz Twardowski jako mistrz i przełożony
On the basis of the Kazimierz Twardowski’s diary, its analysis and also excerpts from his letters to Władysław Witwicki, I describe: (1) the essence and causes which made the “Twardowski-Kreutz” relation so complicated;...