Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2018, Vol 13, Issue 4

Abstract

Whether there are gender differences in lying has been largely debated in the past decade. Previous studies found mixed results. To shed light on this topic, here I report a meta-analysis of 8,728 distinct observations, collected in 65 Sender-Receiver game treatments, by 14 research groups. Following previous work and theoretical considerations, I distinguish three types of lies: black lies, which benefit the liar at a cost for another person; altruistic white lies, which benefit another person at a cost for the liar; and Pareto white lies, which benefit both the liar and another person. The results show that: males are significantly more likely than females to tell black lies (N=4,173); males are significantly more likely than females to tell altruistic white (N=2,940); and results are inconclusive in the case of Pareto white lies (N=1,615). Furthermore, gender differences in telling altruistic white lies are significantly stronger than in the other two cases.

Authors and Affiliations

Valerio Capraro

Keywords

Related Articles

The beauty of simple models: Themes in recognition heuristic research

The advantage of models that do not use flexible parameters is that one can precisely show to what degree they predict behavior, and in what situations. In three issues of this journal, the recognition heuristic has been...

Rebate subsidies, matching subsidies and isolation effects

In a series of recent experiments (Davis, Millner and Reilly, 2005, Eckel and Grossman, 2003, 2005a-c, 2006), matching subsidies generate significantly higher charity receipts than do theoretically equivalent rebate sub...

The effects of behavioral and outcome feedback on prudent decision-making under conditions of present and future uncertainty

One of the largest reasons decision-makers make bad decisions (act imprudently) is that the world is full of uncertainty, we feel uncertain about the consequences of our actions. Participants played a repeated game in wh...

On the descriptive value of loss aversion in decisions under risk: Six clarifications

Previous studies of loss aversion in decisions under risk have led to mixed results. Losses appear to loom larger than gains in some settings, but not in others. The current paper clarifies these results by highlighting...

On the psychology of self-prediction: Consideration of situational barriers to intended actions

When people predict their future behavior, they tend to place too much weight on their current intentions, which produces an optimistic bias for behaviors associated with currently strong intentions. More realistic self-...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678366
  • DOI -
  • Views 131
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Valerio Capraro (2018). Gender differences in lying in sender-receiver games: A meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 13(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678366