God of the Gaps: The Argument from Ignorance and the Limits of Methodological Naturalism
Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2012, Vol 9, Issue 0
Abstract
In this essay I will focus on two important aspects of the philosophical baggage that is carried along in any discussion of the creation/evolution issue. Both involve questions about the nature of scientific methodology. The first deals with creationists’ contention that their creation hypothesis ought to be recognized not only as a legitimate scientific alternative to evolution but perhaps even a better alternative. The second deals with their contention that science, because of its methods, is itself an „established religion”, and an atheist religion at that. In both cases, these contentions are unjustified. Creationists’ negative attacks upon evolution miss their mark — they have not advanced anything close to a positive scientific alternative to evolution, but have simply given an argument form ignorance. The design inference fails to confirm a transcendent designer — whether it is interpreted as an argument by analogy, an inference to the best explanation, or an eliminative argument. In the end, their version is no more than a spurious god-of-the-gaps argument. Creationists’ attack upon scientific method as being dogmatically atheistic is also misplaced. Science, properly understood, is not an „established” religion. It is indeed religiously neutral.
Authors and Affiliations
Robert Pennock
Keywords
Related Articles
- EP ID EP98312
- DOI -
- Views 164
- Downloads 0
The Classification of Creationist Positions
Author analyzes attempts of classifying the creationist positions present in the literature on this subject and then offers his own classification.
On the Nonobviousness of Metaphors
Review of: Magdalena Zawisławska, Metafora w języku nauki. Na przykładzie nauk przyrodniczych, Wydział Polonistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa 2011, pp. 253.
Wielki projekt życia
W styczniu 1982 roku sędzia William K. Overton, podczas słynnego procesu w Arkansas, wydał wyrok, na mocy którego kreacjonizm nie został uznany za teorię naukową. Jednym z argumentów na rzecz kreacjonizmu był argument z...
Genes and Causation
Relating genotypes to phenotypes is problematic not only owing to the extreme complexity of the interactions between genes, proteins and high-level physiological functions but also because the paradigms for genetic causa...
Jak nie należy wykrywać projektu
Artykuł stanowi analizę krytyczną koncepcji filtra eksplanacyjnego, zaprezentowanej przez Williama Dembskiego w książce The Design Inference. Filtr jest rozumiany jako formalizacja procedury prowadzącej do wykrycia, czy...