Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method

Journal Title: Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy - Year 2011, Vol 8, Issue 0

Abstract

Many scientists believe that there is a uniform, interdisciplinary method for the practice of good science. The paradigmatic examples, however, are drawn from classical experimental science. Insofar as historical hypotheses cannot be tested in controlled laboratory settings, historical research is sometimes said to be inferior to experimental research. Using examples from diverse historical disciplines, this paper demonstrates that such claims are misguided. First, the reputed superiority of experimental research is based upon accounts of scientific methodology (Baconian inductivism or falsificationism) that are deeply flawed, both logically and as accounts of the actual practices of scientists. Second, although there are fundamental differences in methodology between experimental scientists and historical scientists, they are keyed to a pervasive feature of nature, a time asymmetry of causation. As a consequence, the claim that historical science is methodologically inferior to experimental science cannot be sustained.

Authors and Affiliations

Carol Cleland

Keywords

Related Articles

Finding Design in Nature

The aim of this paper is to dispel doubts that has grown around the pope John Paul II’s statement in which he allegedly proclaimed his view that the Catholic Church has accepted Darwinian theory of evolution. Cardinal Sc...

Second Thoughts on Naturalistic Theism and Model of Levels of Analysis: A Response to Mark Harris

I shall show that Dr. Harris’ study of biblical scholarship is treated in a very serious manner in my paper, as it is the element identifying him as a representative of naturalistic theism (NT). NT is a position that has...

Istota sporu darwinizmu z teorią inteligentnego projektu: przyrodnicza symfonia makroewolucji

Autor wyjaśnia podstawowe zagadnienia dotyczące sporu pomiędzy teorią inteligentnego projektu a darwinizmem. Przekonuje, że u podstaw teorii inteligentnego projektu leżą przesłanki naukowe, a nie religijne. Spór nie tocz...

Teoria inteligentnego projektu a nadnaturalizm. O tezie, że projektantem może być Bóg lub istoty pozaziemskie

Kiedy rzecznicy teorii inteligentnego projektu (ID) zaprzeczają, że ich teoria ma charakter religijny, opowiadają się za teorią minimalistyczną (teorią mini-ID), według której odkryte w naturze nieredukowalnie złożone ad...

Thomas Aquinas and Evolution: A Polemic with Piotr Lichacz’s and William E. Carroll’s Theses

This paper concerns the relationship between Thomas Aquinas’ doctrine and the concept of biological evolution. It is a response to theses presented by two catholic authors (Piotr Lichacz and William E. Carroll), accordin...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP93002
  • DOI -
  • Views 110
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Carol Cleland (2011). Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method. Filozoficzne Aspekty Genezy, 8(0), 105-120. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-93002