HISTORY: MEMORY AND SCIENCE (METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT)

Abstract

Historical memory and historical science, with a certain similarity, are different in content, origin, purpose. It is oriented ethnic, national, class, group interests. Memory includes a certain system of values, emotionally loaded phenomena, sacred objects, forms and ways of grief, veneration, exaltation. It contains myths and narratives. Objects of historical memory become a way of self-esteem, special pride, and often the focus of identity search. Memory is always selective and correlates with oblivion. The function of memory correction is performed by ideologists and politicians, but based on certain political and ideological doctrines which are neither stable, universal, nor scientific. Science, for example history, is guided by the concepts of truth or intersubjectivity, historical reality and historical fact, historical method and theory. Understanding of the latter can differ, which is an important subject of methodological analysis and requires the connection of philosophers, culturologists, historians, ethnographers. In historical science there are two fundamental paradigms. The first relates historical knowledge to educational goals, which are conditioned by ideological and political guidelines. In this case, even when striving for impartiality, subjectivity of interpretations and departure from objectivity often prevail. It is this paradigm that requires the historian to store and replenish historical memory. The second scientific paradigm characterizes genuine science and presupposes conscious and comprehensive rejection of ideological, political, nationalist, party bias. Historical memory is not adequate to historical reality due to the determining influence of ideology. It is necessary to increase the role of science among the factors that form the historical memory.

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandr Afanasiev, Iryna Vasylenko

Keywords

Related Articles

RESEARCH OF CONVERGENT PROCESSES IN MODERN RELIGIOUS LIFE

Today «convergence» as a concept is used in all its lexical senses (foremost as «the same», «rapprochement», «confluence») and can be applicable for description and classification of all processes formed or finding as ne...

NARCISSUS ARCHETYPE IN «PHILOSOPHICAL SMILE» OF GRYGORIY SKOVORODA

It is analyzed in the article the philosophical problem of person’s comprehension and understanding based on G. Skovoroda’s view. The idea of holistic world and holistic person is achieving by Skovoroda through material...

HERMENEUTICS OF THE CONFIDENCE AND HERMENEUTICS OF THE SUSPICION (to the third thesis of A. N. Rogero)

The article is devoted to analyze of the possibility of the “hermeneutics of confidence” construction. It is proposed to use potential of the M. Bakhtin and M. Heidegger ideas. “Hermeneutics of confidence” outline is des...

THE AESTHETIC SPHERE OF THE JEWISH SPECTATOR AND THE GUILT`S NEGATIVE DIALECTICS: FROM ADORNO` S IMPOSSIBILITY TO W RITE AFTER AUSCHWITZ TO CHAGALL`S EUROPEAN “DEGENERATED ART” Impossibility vs. Unauthenticity: The Abdicated Subject

In the first case, the experience of Auschwitz is devoted to a dialectic discourse that confirms the philosopheme of pure identity as death, in Adorno`s hermeneutical key, opening the dimension of a moral normative mecha...

GOD - HUMAN - MUSIC

Interview with composer (Interview of Marina Rusyayeva) The main theme of the interview with the famous Ukrainian composer Alyona Tomlenova published here is the philosophical and spiritual conception of her symphonic w...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP342638
  • DOI -
  • Views 89
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oleksandr Afanasiev, Iryna Vasylenko (2017). HISTORY: MEMORY AND SCIENCE (METHODOLOGICAL ASPECT). Δόξα / Докса. Збірник наукових праць з філософії та філології, 2(), 33-44. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-342638