How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2013, Vol 8, Issue 3

Abstract

In two studies, time preferences for financial gains and losses at delays of up to 50 years were elicited using three different methods: matching, fixed-sequence choice titration, and a dynamic “staircase” choice method. Matching was found to create fewer demand characteristics and to produce better fits with the hyperbolic model of discounting. The choice-based measures better predicted real-world outcomes such as smoking and payment of credit card debt. No consistent advantages were found for the dynamic staircase method over fixed-sequence titration.

Authors and Affiliations

David J. Hardisty, Katherine F. Thompson, David H. Krantz and Elke U. Weber Supplement

Keywords

Related Articles

A signal detection theory analysis of racial and ethnic disproportionality in the referral and substantiation processes of the U.S. child welfare services system

Signal detection theory (SDT) was developed to analyze the behavior of a single judge but also can be used to analyze decisions made by organizations or other social systems. SDT quantifies the ability to distinguish bet...

Assessing a domain-specific risk-taking construct: A meta-analysis of reliability of the DOSPERT scale

The DOSPERT scale has been used extensively to understand individual differences in risk attitudes across varying decision domains since 2002. The present study reports a reliability generalization meta-analysis to summa...

Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication

In this paper I explore how the evolution of emotional expression and co-operative planning in humans may inform the way they communicate about risks, and what implication this may have for models of rationality in risk...

Are medical treatments for individuals and groups like single-play and multiple-play gambles?

People are often more likely to accept risky monetary gambles with positive expected values when the gambles will be played more than once. We investigated whether this distinction between single-play and multiple-play g...

Conflict of interest and the intrusion of bias

This paper explores the psychology of conflict of interest by investigating how conflicting interests affect both public statements and private judgments. The results suggest that judgments are easily influenced by affil...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP678056
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

David J. Hardisty, Katherine F. Thompson, David H. Krantz and Elke U. Weber Supplement (2013). How to measure time preferences: An experimental comparison of three methods. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-678056