Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2008, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

In this paper I explore how the evolution of emotional expression and co-operative planning in humans may inform the way they communicate about risks, and what implication this may have for models of rationality in risk communication. In particular, I focus on aspects of human language that enable successful co-ordination around shared tasks that involve the management of uncertainty by a group. I distinguish between performative (action-oriented) and constative (description-oriented) aspects of human communication, and argue that the human logical vocabulary of conditionals, quantifiers and probability expressions often conveys pragmatic signals that implicitly encourage or discourage a course of action that is under discussion. I review some studies that illustrate this perspective by highlighting the role of emotional undertone in risk communication and management, and show how it differs from existing models of risk communication and decision-making.

Authors and Affiliations

Denis Hilton

Keywords

Related Articles

Randomization and serial dependence in professional tennis matches: Do strategic considerations, player rankings and match characteristics matter?

In many sports contests, the equilibrium requires players to randomize across repeated rounds, i.e., exhibit no temporal predictability. Such sports data present a window into the (in)efficiency of random sequence genera...

Goals and plans in decision making

We propose a constructed-choice model for general decision making. The model departs from utility theory and prospect theory in its treatment of multiple goals and it suggests several different ways in which context can...

Compensatory versus noncompensatory models for predicting consumer preferences

Standard preference models in consumer research assume that people weigh and add all attributes of the available options to derive a decision, while there is growing evidence for the use of simplifying heuristics. Recent...

The importance of learning when making inferences

The assumption that people possess a repertoire of strategies to solve the inference problems they face has been made repeatedly. The experimental findings of two previous studies on strategy selection are reexamined fro...

How many calories were in those hamburgers again? Distribution density biases recall of attribute values

Decisions that consumers make often rest on evaluations of attributes, such as how large, expensive, good, or fattening an option seems. Extant research has demonstrated that these evaluations in turn depend upon the rec...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677607
  • DOI -
  • Views 140
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Denis Hilton (2008). Emotional tone and argumentation in risk communication. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(1), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677607