IMPACT OF HOMOGENEITY INDEX ON RESPONSE RATE AND SURVIVAL IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMRT

Journal Title: Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences - Year 2019, Vol 8, Issue 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Homogeneity Index (HI) is a measurement used in conformal radiotherapy to evaluate the uniformity of dose distribution in the treatment volume. There are many controversies existing in the clinical usage of Homogeneity Index like the ideal formula to be used to calculate it, which type of radiotherapy (3DCRT/IMRT/SRS) can be evaluated using HI and what its clinical implication is. Even though the ultimate aim of radiation treatment is to improve local control and survival of the patient, there is scarcity of literature as to whether Homogeneity Index has any direct impact on patient survival MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study of 50 patients with head and neck tumours were treated with radical IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Homogeneity Index was calculated using 5 standard formulas and each was correlated with 3-month response rates and local recurrence free survival. Cox regression analysis and multivariate analysis were done to assess the survival and response rates respectively. RESULTS When analyzed together, none of the homogeneity indices showed any direct impact on survival or response rates in patients which were statistically significant. But subgroup analysis showed that when divided into sub sites, the homogeneity index calculated by (D5-D95)/Dp was statistically significant in predicting the local recurrence free survival. The impact of the value on survival when divided into individual sub sites were not analyzed as the sample size was too low. CONCLUSION HI calculated in this study by D5-D95/Dp seems to be the most statistically significant in predicting the local recurrence rates. But the real clinical impact of Homogeneity Index as a clinically important value still remains doubtful and it still does not warrant the status of a standalone value to evaluate plans.

Authors and Affiliations

Flowerlit Thomas, Suresh Kumar K, Mintu Mathew, Kiran P

Keywords

Related Articles

INTUBATING CONDITIONS FOLLOWING RAPID SEQUENCE INDUCTION WITH THREE DOSES OF SUCCINYLCHOLINE

BACKGROUND Whenever rapid sequence induction is considered, succinylcholine is the neuromuscular blocking agent used because of its rapid onset and recovery time. In this study, we are studying the minimum dose required...

PERSISTENT PUPILLARY MEMBRANE- AN OVERVIEW

PRESENTATION OF CASE A 43-year-old working female came to Eye OPD of our hospital with complain of diminished vision in both eyes since childhood, especially at night. She had no relevant past history and also there was...

VACUUM-ASSISTED CLOSURE OF WOUNDS- AN EFFECTIVE METHOD FOR DIABETIC ULCERS

BACKGROUND Wounds are a major source of morbidity, lead to considerable disability and are associated with increased mortality; therefore, they have a significant impact on public health and the expenditure of healthcare...

TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OF INTRAVENOUS MIDAZOLAM VERSUS CLONIDINE AS PREMEDICANTS ON BISPECTRAL INDEX-GUIDED PROPOFOL INDUCTION OF ANAESTHESIA IN GENERAL SURGERY

BACKGROUND Laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation are potent stimuli that can induce increased sympathetic activity leading to tachycardia, hypertension and dysrhythmias. Various drugs and methods have been tried to ob...

GENITAL MOLLUSCUM CONTAGIOSUM AND HIV- A COMPARATIVE STUDY

BACKGROUND Genital Molluscum (GM) is Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD), common in young adults. Will there be any clinical differences including dissemination with HIV status? So, we compared GM clinically in HIV positi...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP553049
  • DOI 10.14260/jemds/2019/14
  • Views 76
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Flowerlit Thomas, Suresh Kumar K, Mintu Mathew, Kiran P (2019). IMPACT OF HOMOGENEITY INDEX ON RESPONSE RATE AND SURVIVAL IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMRT. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8(1), 62-66. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-553049