Implications for the Inclusion of Echo Intensity for Athlete Monitoring: A Mini Review

Journal Title: Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) - Year 2019, Vol 18, Issue 3

Abstract

Ultrasound measurements have been used extensively throughout the literature as a reliable and valid method for examining muscle structure. More recently, ultrasound imaging has been used to guide the training process and it is often incorporated into ongoing athlete monitoring programs. However, most sport practitioners use ultrasound to assess muscle quantity (i.e., muscle size) yet muscle quality is often disregarded. Recent studies have begun differentiating between muscle quantity and muscle quality with the use of computerized grayscale analysis techniques using echo intensity. By using echo intensity, the sport practitioner is able to gauge both intramuscular and intermuscular cellular environments without having to use costly invasive procedures to determine markers of fatigue and training stress associated with muscle damage. Therefore, the purpose of this mini review is to highlight the efficacy of using echo intensity coupled with muscle cross-sectional area imaging to accurately assess training adaptations and recovery to, in turn, improve athletic performance.Sport practitioners (i.e., sport scientists, strength and conditioning coaches, sport coaches, and sports medicine staff) must implement appropriately planned annual training regimens, recovery strategies, and use both accepted and novel athlete monitoring protocols to continually progress athletic performance. Ultrasound measurements have been used extensively throughout the literature as a reliable and valid method for examining muscle structure and muscular adaptations as a result of resistance training [1]. Although this noninvasive method is comparable to other measurement methods such as magnetic resonance imaging [2], ultrasonography is the most practical, resourceful, and time efficient procedure for sport practitioners to implement regarding athlete monitoring. Ultrasound is most commonly used for measuring muscle quantity (i.e., muscle cross-sectional area [CSA]) [3]; however, when assessing only the size of the muscle, ultrasound instrumentation has limitations and cannot account for muscular hydration, glycogen content, triglyceride accrual, inflammation or edema (i.e., muscle swelling). More recently, echo intensity (EI) has been used to determine muscle quality (i.e., intramuscular fibrous and adipose tissue, noncontractile elements) and may give insight into the intramuscular and intermuscular cellular environments [4]. Therefore, monitoring skeletal muscle adaptations in relation to both muscle quantity and quality as a result of resistance training should be considered a mainstay for long-term athlete development [5]. Thus, the purpose of this mini review is to highlight the usefulness of incorporating EI as a sub-analysis of muscle CSA assessments for sport practitioners who currently implement ultrasound instrumentation as part of an ongoing athlete monitoring program.For the general population, ultrasound has been used most commonly to assess injuries, mortality, disease, muscle quantity and muscle quality as it relates to strength and power [6-8]. For example, previous studies have shown that muscle quality of skeletal muscle was indicative of overall strength and power in healthy elderly individuals [9]. Additionally, positive correlations have been observed between torque per unit of muscle mass and cardiovascular parameters (r=0.52 to r=0.60; P < 0.001) giving insight into the potential use to assess neuromuscular and cardiovascular performance. Echo intensity has been shown to independently contribute to muscle strength in both middle-aged and elderly persons and has shown the same contribution in the athletic population [10]. Contemporaneously, sport practitioners have used similar methods to specifically access muscle quantity to determine the effectiveness of periodization and programming as well as an athlete’s potential performance capability (i.e., talent identification) [11,12].

Authors and Affiliations

S Kyle Travis, Ai Ishida

Keywords

Related Articles

Applications of Mass-Spectrometry Based Quantitative Proteomics to Understand Complex Cellular Functions and Cell Fate Decisions

Unlike the transcriptome, quantification of the proteome still requires the development of special strategies. Transcriptomics platforms such as microarray- and RNAseq-based approaches are designed to uncover the informa...

Thiolated DAB Dendrimer-Gold Nanoparticles Self-Assembled Monolayer as Covalent Support for Direct Electrochemistry of HRP and Sensing Applications

A thiolated DAB dendrimer has been employed to bond gold nanoparticles of several sizes in order to obtain an electrocatalytic framework for the covalent immobilization and direct electrochemistry of horseradish peroxida...

Imatinib Induced Delayed and Refractory Generalized Fluid Retention: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Imatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used mainly for ABL-BCR positive CML. Development of fluid retention(FR) following imatinib therapy is the most common side effect. However, sever FR as generalized anasarca, pleur...

Cypriot Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Quality Of Life

The aim of the present study was to investigate the Quality of Life of patients suffering from IBD and the factors that might be affecting it. The idiopathic Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic nosological enti...

Monitoring Training Intensity; Using a Tri-Phasic Model

Introduction: Different training models can produce the same outcome in competition. As the magnitude of change is dependent on the characteristics of the training programs, the duration of the intervention, and the gend...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP620637
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.18.003159
  • Views 163
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S Kyle Travis, Ai Ishida (2019). Implications for the Inclusion of Echo Intensity for Athlete Monitoring: A Mini Review. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 18(3), 13622-13625. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-620637