Implications for the Inclusion of Echo Intensity for Athlete Monitoring: A Mini Review

Journal Title: Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR) - Year 2019, Vol 18, Issue 3

Abstract

Ultrasound measurements have been used extensively throughout the literature as a reliable and valid method for examining muscle structure. More recently, ultrasound imaging has been used to guide the training process and it is often incorporated into ongoing athlete monitoring programs. However, most sport practitioners use ultrasound to assess muscle quantity (i.e., muscle size) yet muscle quality is often disregarded. Recent studies have begun differentiating between muscle quantity and muscle quality with the use of computerized grayscale analysis techniques using echo intensity. By using echo intensity, the sport practitioner is able to gauge both intramuscular and intermuscular cellular environments without having to use costly invasive procedures to determine markers of fatigue and training stress associated with muscle damage. Therefore, the purpose of this mini review is to highlight the efficacy of using echo intensity coupled with muscle cross-sectional area imaging to accurately assess training adaptations and recovery to, in turn, improve athletic performance.Sport practitioners (i.e., sport scientists, strength and conditioning coaches, sport coaches, and sports medicine staff) must implement appropriately planned annual training regimens, recovery strategies, and use both accepted and novel athlete monitoring protocols to continually progress athletic performance. Ultrasound measurements have been used extensively throughout the literature as a reliable and valid method for examining muscle structure and muscular adaptations as a result of resistance training [1]. Although this noninvasive method is comparable to other measurement methods such as magnetic resonance imaging [2], ultrasonography is the most practical, resourceful, and time efficient procedure for sport practitioners to implement regarding athlete monitoring. Ultrasound is most commonly used for measuring muscle quantity (i.e., muscle cross-sectional area [CSA]) [3]; however, when assessing only the size of the muscle, ultrasound instrumentation has limitations and cannot account for muscular hydration, glycogen content, triglyceride accrual, inflammation or edema (i.e., muscle swelling). More recently, echo intensity (EI) has been used to determine muscle quality (i.e., intramuscular fibrous and adipose tissue, noncontractile elements) and may give insight into the intramuscular and intermuscular cellular environments [4]. Therefore, monitoring skeletal muscle adaptations in relation to both muscle quantity and quality as a result of resistance training should be considered a mainstay for long-term athlete development [5]. Thus, the purpose of this mini review is to highlight the usefulness of incorporating EI as a sub-analysis of muscle CSA assessments for sport practitioners who currently implement ultrasound instrumentation as part of an ongoing athlete monitoring program.For the general population, ultrasound has been used most commonly to assess injuries, mortality, disease, muscle quantity and muscle quality as it relates to strength and power [6-8]. For example, previous studies have shown that muscle quality of skeletal muscle was indicative of overall strength and power in healthy elderly individuals [9]. Additionally, positive correlations have been observed between torque per unit of muscle mass and cardiovascular parameters (r=0.52 to r=0.60; P < 0.001) giving insight into the potential use to assess neuromuscular and cardiovascular performance. Echo intensity has been shown to independently contribute to muscle strength in both middle-aged and elderly persons and has shown the same contribution in the athletic population [10]. Contemporaneously, sport practitioners have used similar methods to specifically access muscle quantity to determine the effectiveness of periodization and programming as well as an athlete’s potential performance capability (i.e., talent identification) [11,12].

Authors and Affiliations

S Kyle Travis, Ai Ishida

Keywords

Related Articles

Correlation between Parasitic Infections in HIV Patients Parasitic Infections in HIV Patients

Individuals with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) have a predisposition to opportunistic infections. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of parasitic infections in patients with HIV/AID...

The Pediatric Neurosurgery in Northeast Brazil – Recife Has Become a Reference Centre

Brazil is the biggest Latin American country, with approximately 8,500,000Km², almost 195,000,000 inhabitants, close to 23 inhabitants perKm², 36% under 19 years old, with an infant mortality rate of 20.7 per 1000 live b...

Okadaic Acid Induces the Rats� Memory Impairment and Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation And Intervened by Flavonoids from Stem and Leaf of Scutellaria Baicalensis Georgi

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive cognitive impairment. The neuropathology of AD is represented by widespread deposits of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) formed by phosph...

Chemical Properties and Microbiological Profile of kunu zaki, A Non-Alcoholic Beverage

Kunu zaki is a popular indigenous cereal based non-alcoholic beverage widely consumed, especially in the Northern Nigeria. Composite samples randomly collected were screened for pH, titratable and microbiological charact...

Clinically Beneficial Application of Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)

For the treatment of diabetes, it is important to manage glucose variability and to prevent microvascular complications as well as long-term macrovascular disease [1]. HbA1c has been the gold standard for monitoring gluc...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP620637
  • DOI 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.18.003159
  • Views 196
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

S Kyle Travis, Ai Ishida (2019). Implications for the Inclusion of Echo Intensity for Athlete Monitoring: A Mini Review. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research (BJSTR), 18(3), 13622-13625. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-620637