Individual welfare as an object of social research

Abstract

The article deals with the study of individual well-being in sociological approach to isolate those aspects, the empirical research of which will provide much information about the phenomenon. Well-being is understood as a “state of equilibrium or balance that can be affected by life events or challenges” (R. Dodge, A. P. Daly, J. Huyton, L. D. Sanders, 2012). The scheme of the study of individual well-being, consisting of subjective, socio-psychological, social, cultural and educational, political, economic, environmental indicators, is proposed. It is noted that well-being of personality is primarily subjective in its nature, but for the complex research of the problems it is necessary to take into account social, economic, political and legal, cultural and educational factors. R. Inglehart in his theory of post-materialism highlights a number of values that are directly incorporated into the structure of civic culture, and thus form the value aspect of the macrolevel that influences on the interrelation of “social – individual”. It is concluded that individual well-being is a complex socio-psychological phenomenon, the study of which in the sociological dimension requires taking into account objective and subjective approaches, evaluation of various aspects of human life. Sociological analysis of the phenomenon on the base of psychological, sociological and statistical data will provide much information about the level of individual well-being of the population of some territory or members of certain social groups and that will help to identify the most problematic and gender sensitive aspects of the studied phenomenon. The examples of empirical research of various aspects of well-being are presented: in Ukraine these are Integral index of social well-being (IISWB), Index of social well-being (ISWB), Index of individual well-being (IIWB); at a global level these are UN Human Development Index, Quality of Life Index, Happy Planet Index, a global study “The World Happiness Report” and other.

Authors and Affiliations

О. А. Дячук

Keywords

Related Articles

Limitation of freedom of speech in the context of media coverage of antiterrorist fight: the scientific understanding of the problem

The article considers the main approaches to the problem of ensuring freedom of speech and the media during antiterrorist operations in a democratic society. Mechanisms of limitations of freedom of speech during media...

Some aspects of legal restrictions concerning joint work of relative persons application to the heads of the health care units

The article is devoted to the system-structural analysis of the national anticorruption legislation provisions as well as norms relating to the legal status of heads of the health care units (in particular, heads of the...

The conflict potential of inter-state relations in the Middle East after the ‘Arab Spring’: the current state and prospects of development

The development of the contemporary system of international relations in the Middle East is marked by a high intensity of the conflict-based type of interactions between key actor of the regional politics, which thereby...

THE IMPACT OF CENSORING AND FILTERING PRACTICES IN THE UKRAINIAN INTERNET ON UKRAINE’S INTERNATIONAL IMAGE IN CONTEXT OF RUSSIAN MILITARY AGGRESSION

Despite the war, the process of Ukraine’s eurointegration continues and puts the country under tight scrutiny of Western NGO’s and international organizations, concerned with the state of Ukrainian civil society, democra...

Political lobbying in Ukraine within legal and security dimensions

The article is aimed at the analysis of existing since independence political lobbying processes in the context of their role in Ukrainian political system’s stabilization and national security ensuring. The article dis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP445404
  • DOI -
  • Views 164
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. А. Дячук (2016). Individual welfare as an object of social research. Вісник Національного технічного університету України “Київський політехнічний інститут”. Політологія. Соціологія. Право., 3(), 75-81. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-445404