Innumeracy and incentives: A ratio bias experiment

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2007, Vol 2, Issue 4

Abstract

The Ratio-Bias phenomenon, observed by psychologist Seymour Epstein and colleagues, is a systematic manifestation of irrationality. When offered a choice between two lotteries, individuals consistently choose the lottery with the greater number of potential successes, even when it offers a smaller probability of success. In the current study, we conduct experiments to confirm this phenomenon and test for the existence of Bias as distinct from general irrationality. Moreover, we examine the effect of introducing a monetary incentive of varying size (depending on the treatment) on the extent of irrational choices within this framework. We confirm the existence of the Bias. Moreover, the existence of an incentive significantly reduces the extent of irrationality exhibited, and that this effect is roughly linear in response to changes in the size of the incentive within the magnitudes investigated.

Authors and Affiliations

Donald Dale, Jeffrey Rudski, Adam Schwartz and Eric Smith

Keywords

Related Articles

Cynicism in negotiation: When communication increases buyers’ skepticism

The economic literature on negotiation shows that strategic concerns can be a barrier to agreement, even when the buyer values the good more than the seller. Yet behavioral research demonstrates that human interaction ca...

Atypical moral judgment following traumatic brain injury

Previous research has shown an association between emotions, particularly social emotions, and moral judgments. Some studies suggested an association between blunted emotion and the utilitarian moral judgments observed i...

Aging and choice: Applications to Medicare Part D

We examined choice behavior in younger versus older adults using a medical decision-making task similar to Medicare Part D. The study was designed to assess age differences in choice processes in general and specifically...

Modeling and debiasing resource saving judgments

Svenson (2011) showed that choices of one of two alternative productivity increases to save production resources (e.g., man-months) were biased. Judgments of resource savings following a speed increase from a low product...

Weighing waiting: The influence of information certainty and delay penalty on waiting for noninstrumental information

People have been shown to delay decision making to wait for missing noninstrumental attribute information — information that would not have altered their decision if known at the outset — with this delay originally attri...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677583
  • DOI -
  • Views 189
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Donald Dale, Jeffrey Rudski, Adam Schwartz and Eric Smith (2007). Innumeracy and incentives: A ratio bias experiment. Judgment and Decision Making, 2(4), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677583