INSTITUTIONAL PECULIARITIES AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN UKRAINE

Abstract

The innovative way to solve acute social problems is implementation of social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. World expiries shows the effectiveness of this model of business activity. The analysis of national literature and economic practice gives the reasons to tell that the ideas of social entrepreneurship have not been spreaded in our country yet. There is a lack of unity to determine the category. Due to that the main approaches of social entrepreneurship’s definition in different countries is considered in this article. Thus the social enterprises in the USA are considered as a form of entrepreneur, commercial activity, that is used by NPO’s to create a revenue and to strengthen of social mission result. In European countries the social entrepreneurship is determinate as a business with a social mission. International organizations determine social entrepreneurship as an innovative business activity to social change at the societies and communities. Social enterprises only start to be created in Ukraine. According to the statistics we have only 42 of them in 2013 year but actually there are more then 200. Statistic data gives an opportunity to show the trends of these enterprises in Ukraine. From this analysis we can distinguish such barriers of the social entrepreneurship development: the absence of the term "social entrepreneurship" in Ukrainian law; lack of publicly recognized examples of social entrepreneurship, lack of good experience in this field; undeveloped infrastructure of social enterprises support in the "third sector" and in the business; the problem of raising funds at outset of the business, there is no special credit programs; low level of public commitment to the values of social solidarity and indifference to problems that do not concern them personally. Institutional features of social entrepreneurship development can be represented in the form such theses: «give us money», «we don’t care», «I will not say something», «who needs that», «law is like a beam». The argumentation of these theses can clearly illustrates the problems of the implementation problems of the social entrepreneurship in Ukraine.

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandr Saienko

Keywords

Related Articles

REGIONAL COOPERATION WITH SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP FROM PODLASIE PROVINCE

The lack of particular vision in functioning and development of the majority of social companies poses a serious threat to them. The eternal problem of social companies located in Podlasie is the constant developmental d...

PROMOTING THE EMPLOYMENT OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES BY CREATING SOCIAL ENTERPRISES IN UKRAINE 

Nowadays Ukraine is trying to restruct medical model of disability to social. Social model of disability consists in the relationship between a person with disabilities and society. Medical model, which was characterist...

CRITERIA OF STUDY PROGRAM SELECTION AND SATISFACTION WITH STUDIES IN VILNIUS COOPERATIVE COLLEGE

Successful selection of study program and students satisfaction with studies have a significant impact on achieving of good study results and becoming a good specialist for labour market. Students use a big variety of se...

HIGHER SCHOOLS COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE FACTORS

In global market competitiveness of higher education is associated with educational institutions managers’ ability to maintain their own position and react operatively towards economic and political changes, fluctuating...

EXTENSION OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL WHILE INTEGRATING TEL INTO BUSINESSORGANIZATION

Purpose of the article is by making scientific literature analysis reveal how technology acceptance model proposed by Davis (1986)could be expanded while integrating TEL into business organization. Technology acceptance...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP157138
  • DOI -
  • Views 123
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Oleksandr Saienko (2013). INSTITUTIONAL PECULIARITIES AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN UKRAINE. Role of Higher Education Institutions in Society: Challenges, Tendencies and Perspectives, 1(2), 239-243. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-157138