Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung?

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Order and change in nature have been for a long time understood in philosophy and theology as founded in divine reason. In the neo-Darwinist theory of evolution, their explanation is reduced to material change without reason. Molecular biologists like M. Behe and W. Demski argue that any reductionist explanation of living beings must be wrong. The evolution of irreducible complex structures is impossible on the basis of random variation and natural selection alone, and must be the result of intelligent design. The article argues that ID-theory, unlike Biblical Creationism, is a challenge for neo-Darwinism and for modern theology as well—for, unlike the Roman magisterium, many Catholic theologians try to harmonize reductive explanation with the notion of creation.

Authors and Affiliations

Berthold Wald

Keywords

Related Articles

KLUGHEIT. GRUNDBEGRIFF DES PRAKTISCHEN BEI ARISTOTELES

The article begins by recalling the most important understandings associated with the term prudence in the history of philosophy. Then it introduces the Aristotelian concept of prudence linked to practical truth—prudence...

Podmiotowy aspekt wiary według Immanuela Kanta

"The Subjective Aspect of Faith According to Immanuel Kant:" The subjective faith, in Kant’s approach, is a way of recognizing truth. This method is justified by subjective reasons, with the simultaneous lack of objectiv...

El oscurecimiento del ser y su sustitución por la existencia

Title: "The Obscuring of Esse and Its Substitution by Existence." The question of the real distinction between esse and essence in being constitutes the core of Thomistic ontology. While there is a primacy of esse over...

E-BOOK: Studia Gilsoniana 1

Studia Gilsoniana 1

Compositions of Being: Metaphysical and Non-Metaphysical Ways of Understanding and Discerning Them

This article discusses different ways of understanding compositions of being, and different methods for discerning them. It considers non-metaphysical (physical, scientistic, phenomenological, abstractionist) interpretat...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252293
  • DOI -
  • Views 206
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Berthold Wald (2017). Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung?. Studia Gilsoniana, 6(2), 287-321. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252293