Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung? [Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?]

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Order and change in nature have been for a long time understood in philosophy and theology as founded in divine reason. In the neo-Darwinist theory of evolution, their explanation is reduced to material change without reason. Molecular biologists like M. Behe and W. Demski argue that any reductionist explanation of living beings must be wrong. The evolution of irreducible complex structures is impossible on the basis of random variation and natural selection alone, and must be the result of intelligent design. The article argues that ID-theory, unlike Biblical Creationism, is a challenge for neo-Darwinism and for modern theology as well—for, unlike the Roman magisterium, many Catholic theologians try to harmonize reductive explanation with the notion of creation.

Authors and Affiliations

Berthold Wald

Keywords

Related Articles

E-BOOK: Studia Gilsoniana 8, no. 2 (2019)

● Richard J. Fafara: Gilson on Philosophy and Civilization ● Michał Chaberek: A Textual Analysis of John Paul II’s Teaching on Evolution ● Anthony Daum: St. Thomas Aquinas and Fr. Réginald Garrigou-Lagrange on Wonder and...

Thomistic Personalism as the Key to Understanding Human Altruism

In this paper, the author attempts to explain human altruism within the framework of Thomistic personalism. He claims that (1) Thomistic personalism provides the necessary tools for understanding the human being as perso...

EGZYSTENCJALNA INTERPRETACJA TOMASZA Z AKWINU KONCEPCJI BYTU W UJĘCIU ÉTIENNE GILSONA

The article attempts to present Étienne Gilson’s approach to Thomas Aquinas’ existen-tial interpretation of being. The French thinker’s apprehension of Aquinas’ system is characterized by accentuating existential perspec...

E-BOOK: Studia Gilsoniana 6, no. 1 (2017)

Roberta Bayer: Finding a Reasonable Foundation for Peace ● Robert A. Delfino, Andrew Gniadek: Theology for Nones: Helping People Find God in a Secular Age ● Lois Eveleth: Professional Responsibility and Conflict of Inter...

ARISTOTLE AND THE POSTMODERN WORLD

With the support of recent scholarship the author proposes an understanding of the Aristotelian Corpus inspired by the biological works. He points out that this understanding is bound up with other current philosophical...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252292
  • DOI -
  • Views 203
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Berthold Wald (2017). Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung? [Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?]. Studia Gilsoniana, 6(2), 287-321. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252292