Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung? [Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?]

Journal Title: Studia Gilsoniana - Year 2017, Vol 6, Issue 2

Abstract

Order and change in nature have been for a long time understood in philosophy and theology as founded in divine reason. In the neo-Darwinist theory of evolution, their explanation is reduced to material change without reason. Molecular biologists like M. Behe and W. Demski argue that any reductionist explanation of living beings must be wrong. The evolution of irreducible complex structures is impossible on the basis of random variation and natural selection alone, and must be the result of intelligent design. The article argues that ID-theory, unlike Biblical Creationism, is a challenge for neo-Darwinism and for modern theology as well—for, unlike the Roman magisterium, many Catholic theologians try to harmonize reductive explanation with the notion of creation.

Authors and Affiliations

Berthold Wald

Keywords

Related Articles

COUNTERPOINT IN EXPLANATION OF ORIGINATIVE APPREHENSION

Originative apprehension often has been examined in recent decades in light of Aqui-nas’ reflections. Yet there has not always been agreement in regard to what constitutes such, often due to different emphases given by i...

GILSON—NEWMAN—BLONDEL?

The article analyzes the dispute between Étienne Gilson and Maurice Blondel. Their dispute is quite notorious and, even though all the reasons behind it are unknown, casts a shadow on the French philosophy of Christian i...

THE ESSENTIAL CONNECTION BETWEEN COMMON SENSE PHILOSOPHY AND LEADERSHIP EXCELLENCE

This article argues that, strictly speaking, from its inception with the an-cient Greeks and for all time, philosophy and science are identical and consist in an essential relationship between a specific type of understa...

GILSON ON DOGMATISM

The article aims at uncovering reasons why philosophy may become conducive to dogmatism which inevitably leads to the failure of philosophy. In the light of Gilson’s considerations contained in his The Unity of Philosoph...

Walter Kaufmann: Philosopher, Humanist, Heretic by Stanley Corngold

This paper is a review of the book: Stanley Corngold, Walter Kaufmann: Philosopher, Humanist, Heretic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018). The author concludes that Corngold’s book acquaints the reader not only...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP252292
  • DOI -
  • Views 194
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Berthold Wald (2017). Intelligent Design—Fundamentalismus oder unbequeme Herausforderung? [Intelligent Design—Fundamentalism or Uncomfortable Challenge?]. Studia Gilsoniana, 6(2), 287-321. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-252292