Intertrochanteric Fracture Management Proximal Femoral Nailing Vs Dynamic Hip Screw

Abstract

Intertrochanteric fracture is one of the most common fractures of the hip especially in the elderly with osteoporotic bones, usually due to low-energy trauma like simple falls. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) is still considered the gold standard for treating intertrochanteric fractures by many. Not many studies compare the DHS with Proximal femoral nail (PFN), in type 1 and Type 2 intertrochanteric fractures (Boyd and Griffin classification). This study was done to compare the functional and radiological outcome of PFN with DHS in treatment of type 1 and Type 2 intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: From December 2015 to December 2017, a prospective comparative study was done where 30 alternative cases of type 1 and type 2 intertrochanteric fractures of hip were operated using PFN or DHS. Intraoperative complications were noted. Functional outcome was assessed using Harris Hip Score and radiological findings were compared at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The average age of the patients was 59 years. In our series we found that patients with DHS had increased intraoperative blood loss (180ml), longer duration of surgery (115min), and required longer time for mobilization while patients who underwent PFN had lower intraoperative blood loss (70ml), shorter duration of surgery (85min), and allowed early mobilization. The average limb shortening in DHS group was 9.31 mm as compared with PFN group which was only 4.70 mm. The patients treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early post-op period. At the end of 12th month, there was not much difference in the functional outcome between the two groups. Conclusion: PFN is better than DHS in stable intertrochanteric fractures in terms of decreased blood loss, reduced duration of surgery, early weight bearing and mobilization, reduced hospital stay, decreased risk of infection and decreased complications.

Authors and Affiliations

Ashok Bangarshettar, yogesh kadam

Keywords

Related Articles

Serum Procalcitonin Levels Effectiveness For Differentiating Infectious From Non-Infectious Causes Of Fever After Surgery- An Original Study

Aims And Objectives:To study the effectiveness of serum procalcitonin levels for differentiating infectious from non-infectious causes of fever after surgery. Material And Methods: The study was conducted on 400 patients...

Study Of Functional Outcome With Common Forms Of Internal Fixation For Patellar Fractures

To assess the functional outcome of common surgical procedures (Figure of 8 tension band wiring, Cerclage wiring, Interfragmentary screw, Combined Tension band with Cerclage wiring) for treatment of fracture patella.

Functional Outcome Of Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction Using Semi-Tendinosus Graft

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament is a common occurrence these days due to increased participation in sports and vehicular accidents. The present study was carried out as with an aim to assess th...

Clinical Study Correlating Early Results Of Knee Range Of Motion In Posterior Cruciate Retaining And Stabilizing Total Knee Arthroplasty In A Tertiary Care Hospital

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty is a commonly performed surgery, most common indication being knee pain associated with functional limitations in activities of daily living. Near normal biomechanics duplication is...

Comparative study between results of orthogonal vs parallel plating in treatment of distal humerus fracture

Background: The study was conducted to evaluate the outcome of the parallel plating system and orthogonal plating system in distal humerus intraarticular fracture Material and Methods: 30 patients of age between 18 to...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP534226
  • DOI -
  • Views 336
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ashok Bangarshettar, yogesh kadam (2018). Intertrochanteric Fracture Management Proximal Femoral Nailing Vs Dynamic Hip Screw. International Journal of Orthopaedics Traumatology & Surgical Sciences, 4(2), 271-277. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-534226