Introduction. Paradigms of Justice
Journal Title: Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy - Year 2009, Vol 1, Issue 2
Abstract
Theories of justice are marred by a permanent state of conflict because they express prejudices whose source lies in the lifeworld. One may regard these theories as interpretations of the concept of justice. Assuming a strong meaning of “theory,” one can legitimately ask if it is possible to reduce a theory of justice to its underlying paradigm. Several different paradigms coexist in modernity; the tension between them has intensified with the advent of political ideologies. The newest paradigm of justice is global justice. Yet the epistemic status of all theories of justice is ambiguous. A theory of justice is true to the extent that it is right, and false if it is not. This applies to Rawls’ theory, as well.
Authors and Affiliations
Corneliu Bilba
Thinking Differently: Continental Philosophy versus Philosophy of Religion
Morny Joy (ed.), Continental Philosophy and Philosophy of Religion, New York, London, Dordrecht, Heidelberg: Springer 2011
Cosmodernisme ou le nouvel imaginaire
Christian Moraru, Cosmodernism. American Narrative, Late Globalization, and the new Cultural Imaginary, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2011
Why we always go back to Darwin?
Mircea Flonta, Darwin şi după Darwin. Studii de filozofie a biologiei [Darwin et après Darwin. Études de philosophie de la biologie], Bucureşti: Humanitas, 2010
Postmodernism Revisited: Current Trends and Interpretations
Stuart Sim, Fifty Key Postmodern Thinkers. London and New York: Routledge, 2013, 264 p.
Interpretive Truth and Interpretive Validity: Remarks on Danto’s Idea of “Constitutive Interpretation”
Given an interpretive ontology of the artwork, exemplified by Danto’s “constitutive interpretation” thesis, the present paper considers a fundamental “obscurity” at the heart of the artistic (contemporary) phenomenon – t...