INVALIDITY OF INVALID (INVIATIVE) AND UNRESPECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE ACTION

Journal Title: Правовий часопис Донбасу - Year 2018, Vol 63, Issue 2

Abstract

The article considers the problem of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. Attention is focused on the concept of «urgency» in the general sense and in the criminal procedural aspect. The issue of generalization of grounds for urgency in the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine is discussed. There is a need to define not only the concept of the urgency of conducting investigative (investigative) actions, the decision-making mechanism on the urgency of conducting investigative (investigative) and secret investigative (investigative) actions, but also in summarizing all those actual and legal signs that indicate the urgency of their conduct . We will not consider certain mechanisms. It is necessary to conduct a more detailed and qualified study. For the purpose of generalization, we will consider only the main signs of urgency. Namely, the concept of the urgency of investigative (investigative) actions, which are indicated above, give grounds to determine common signs of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. The above, gives grounds to determine the general signs of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. Those, according to the current criminal procedural legislation are signs that indicate an extreme need: to prevent the loss of traces of a criminal offense or escape of a suspect; save lives and property; directly prosecute persons suspected of committing a crime; prevent the commission of a grave or especially serious crime. It is the generalization in one, separate norm of the criminal procedural legislation of the concept and signs of urgency, which will create more convenient conditions for decision-making regarding the urgency of investigative (investigative) and tacit (investigative) investigative actions for practical employees in the field of criminal proceedings.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrey Shulga

Keywords

Related Articles

WAREHOUSE-VEHICLE WATER COMPONENT SYSTEMS AND FACTORS AFFECTING THE SECURITY OF ROAD TRAFFIC

This article deals with the problems of road safety. The characteristic of the "road-car driver," based on the works of scholars and own perspective identifies the key factors that affect road safety.

THE ESSENCE AND STARTING POINT OF THE STATE IN THE DOCTRINE OF H. ORTEGA Y GASSET

The socio-historical foundations of the state are revealed - its essence and starting signs in the doctrine of H. Ortega y Gasset. The state, in the theory of the Spanish philosopher, appears as a spiritual phenomenon th...

FORMS OF SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR CRIME RELEASE

The article is devoted to the scientific and methodological provision of counteraction to crime, which is largely due to changes in the life of society, the aggravation of the crime situation and is the key to increasin...

THE PARTICIPATION OF THE PARTIES IN PROVING: ETHICAL LEGAL ASPECT

Proof is defined as the activity of competent participants procedural relations on the collection, verification and evaluation of evidence for the purpose of establishment of circumstances relevant for correct resolution...

SERIOUS PICTURE AS A ELEMENT OF CRIMINALISTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMES HOW TO PLAY A PLAY BUSINESS

The author of the article defines the content and trace element pattern as criminological characteristics of crimes against occupation gambling. Analyzed scientific approaches to understanding the concept of "trace of cr...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP372901
  • DOI -
  • Views 88
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrey Shulga (2018). INVALIDITY OF INVALID (INVIATIVE) AND UNRESPECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE ACTION. Правовий часопис Донбасу, 63(2), 160-163. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-372901