INVALIDITY OF INVALID (INVIATIVE) AND UNRESPECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE ACTION

Journal Title: Правовий часопис Донбасу - Year 2018, Vol 63, Issue 2

Abstract

The article considers the problem of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. Attention is focused on the concept of «urgency» in the general sense and in the criminal procedural aspect. The issue of generalization of grounds for urgency in the criminal procedural legislation of Ukraine is discussed. There is a need to define not only the concept of the urgency of conducting investigative (investigative) actions, the decision-making mechanism on the urgency of conducting investigative (investigative) and secret investigative (investigative) actions, but also in summarizing all those actual and legal signs that indicate the urgency of their conduct . We will not consider certain mechanisms. It is necessary to conduct a more detailed and qualified study. For the purpose of generalization, we will consider only the main signs of urgency. Namely, the concept of the urgency of investigative (investigative) actions, which are indicated above, give grounds to determine common signs of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. The above, gives grounds to determine the general signs of the urgency of conducting investigative (search) and secret investigative (search) actions. Those, according to the current criminal procedural legislation are signs that indicate an extreme need: to prevent the loss of traces of a criminal offense or escape of a suspect; save lives and property; directly prosecute persons suspected of committing a crime; prevent the commission of a grave or especially serious crime. It is the generalization in one, separate norm of the criminal procedural legislation of the concept and signs of urgency, which will create more convenient conditions for decision-making regarding the urgency of investigative (investigative) and tacit (investigative) investigative actions for practical employees in the field of criminal proceedings.

Authors and Affiliations

Andrey Shulga

Keywords

Related Articles

THE CATEGORY «STATE FUNCTION» IN MODERN DOMESTIC LEGAL SCIENCE

The diverse conceptual apparatus of legal science is in a permanent state of renovation, which takes place in accordance with the development of state-legal phenomen. But there are a number of categories that, regardless...

CONCEPT OF SUCCESSFUL WORK OF THE SUBMITTERS OF THE CRIMINAL MILITARY OFFICE OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF UKRAINE

The article is sanctified to determination of concept of search work of subdivisions of criminal militia of Ministry of internal affairs of Ukraine. An analysis is conducted of scientific works of scientists, investigati...

PENSIONS RECALCULATION OF FORMER MILITIA EMPLOYEES

This article is dedicated to the research of the problems of pension’s recalculation of former militia employees due to the increase of policemen money security. The ratio of the concepts of a «police officer» and the co...

CONCERNING THE CRITERIA OF QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF CRIMINOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES OF THE PROSECUTION

It is regarding the question of the relevance of the definition of the criteria of quality and efficiency of criminological activities of the prosecutor's office. Paid attention to their interdependence and the urgent ne...

PROBLEMS AND ACHIEVEMENTS IN THE ORGANIZATION OF THE WORK OF THE JUVENILE PREVENTION UNITS OF THE NATIONAL POLICE OF UKRAINE

The article is devoted to the organizational and legal aspects of the activities of newly created divisions of the juvenile prevention of the National Police of Ukraine. The organizational and legal aspects of the new se...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP372901
  • DOI -
  • Views 93
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Andrey Shulga (2018). INVALIDITY OF INVALID (INVIATIVE) AND UNRESPECTIVE INVESTIGATIVE ACTION. Правовий часопис Донбасу, 63(2), 160-163. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-372901