KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI POSITIF LEGISLATOR ATAS PUTUSAN NO. 21/PUU-XII/2014 TENTANG PENAMBAHAN OBJEK PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA DALAM PRAPERADILAN

Journal Title: Diversi Jurnal Hukum - Year 2017, Vol 3, Issue 1

Abstract

One of the Authorities of the Constitutional Court is to review the Act against the 1945 Constitution or commonly referred to as the judicial review of the Constitutional Court in passing the Tests Act against the 1945 Constitution is only allowed to interpret the contents of the Act in accordance with the original intent made by the institution authorized to establish its (Positive Legislator). The Constitutional Court may only declare a Constitution contrary to the 1945 Constitution and is not permitted to enter the legislative domain (participate in any arrangement) in its general limitation. Such Tasks and Authorities are attributed to the notion that the House of Representatives and the Government are Positive Legislator (the author of the norm) while the Constitutional Court is a Negative Legislator (eraser or nullifying norm). This is reinforced by Article 57 of Law No. 8 of 2011 on the Constitutional Court. But in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 About the addition of suspect status assignment into Pretrial Objects. Constitutional Court Justices have provided interpretation by adding new norms to the tested norms. This has given many legal consequences and new law problems in society. Because the Constitutional Court's decision is Final and binding since it was first pronounced in open plenary session. Without any legal action that can be taken related to the content of the decision.

Authors and Affiliations

Agus Prabowo

Keywords

Related Articles

KAJIAN YURIDIS PENGESAMPINGAN PASAL 1266 DAN PASAL 1267 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PERDATA SEBAGAI SYARAT BATAL DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN

Banks in the credit agreement using more standardized credit agreements, the use of standard contracts in the banking credit agreement is based on 2 (two) things, (1) The existence of unbalanced position (bargaining posi...

FORMULASI KEBIJAKAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN TERHADAP WARTAWAN SAAT BERTUGAS DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PERS DI MASA MENDATANG

Policy formulation is a step of political prevalent in doing in law. Crimes of violence against reporters as the line of duty profession journalistic in the act of press in the future, need to formulated with goo. For th...

POLITIK HUKUM PENYELESAIAN KONFLIK BERBASIS AGAMA DI INDONESIA

The Constitution and other legislation have guaranteed the upholding of religious freedom, but there are still acts of violation of religious freedom that lead to conflicts that are often found in Indonesia, whether the...

ANALISA YURIDIS PUTUSAN PERKARA NOMOR 04/PDT.G/2007/PN.PSB TENTANG PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH POLRI

Pemberitaan tentang polisi yang melakukan penembakan sering menjadi perhatian publik, terlebih terhadap polisi yang salah tembak. Tidak sedikit polisi yang kemudian diperiksa, ditindak dan diajukan ke sidang pengadilan a...

PERANAN HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E COMMERCE

E-commerce provides convenience in conducting trade. Internet media has no geographical limitation in the transaction does not close the possibility raises several problems in the event of a dispute. Law in that it has a...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP355463
  • DOI -
  • Views 37
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Agus Prabowo (2017). KAJIAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI POSITIF LEGISLATOR ATAS PUTUSAN NO. 21/PUU-XII/2014 TENTANG PENAMBAHAN OBJEK PENETAPAN STATUS TERSANGKA DALAM PRAPERADILAN. Diversi Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 93-138. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-355463