Language and Modernity

Abstract

The contemporary Ukrainian society allocates two types of the sociocultural formations, namely traditional and modern. Each of these two has its own values with one mutual value, that is language. According to Robert Hollinger the terms traditional and modern refer to the types of society. As a rule, the traditional society is largely ‘rural, agricultural, authoritarian, religious, relatively small in population, relatively homogeneous and precapitalist or early capitalist’; vice versa the modern society is characterized by ‘the growth of urban areas, various forms of capitalism, democracy, science and technology, massive population grown and concentration, and cultural, political, and religious heterogeneity’ [see 10]. The different features – rural, authoritarian, homogeneous vs urban, democracy, heterogeneity – determine the social attitude to the language; the social functions of the language; the tradition of the language legislation; and the strategies and practices of the languages confrontation or collaboration. It is important to use only one language which has a great value for ‘rural, authoritarian, homogeneous’ society. Here this one language has three main functions: consolidating, separating and integrating and provides the homogeneity. The legislation is aimed at protecting this language. The ‘urban, democracy, heterogeneity’ society provides the other social lingual strategies. The language continues to be the value but it’s not already about the exclusiveness. Much more important is the opportunity of the language to support the changes and diversities; to be the active player in the economic, politic, intellectual spheres; to be able to co-live and co-work with the other languages in multilingual social space in the time of globality.

Authors and Affiliations

О. М. Демська

Keywords

Related Articles

Intensified expressiveness of parentetic constructions in the language of Ukrainian press

The article deals with one of the common way of the expression of intensified newspaper discourse. The object of attention has become some semantic types of parentetical constructions, which can act as syntax expressems...

The character of the latest borrowings in English language (on the material of Oxford Dictionary).

This article deals with the problem of language contacts. It focuses on the development of borrowings with the main attention paid to contemporary English. This work is devoted to the analysis of new lexical borrowings t...

The verbs of being with the postfix -ся: semantic-grammatical and functional characteristics.

The verbs of being in the Ukrainian language form a large group but their lexical-semantic, word-formation, grammatical characteristics are not clarified (with the exception of individual studies, the dissertation resear...

МЕТАКОМУНІКАТИВНИЙ ВОКАБУЛЯР НА РІВНІ ІНТРАТЕКСТУАЛЬНОЇ РЕАЛЬНОСТІ

У статті йдеться про вивчення контекстуально залежних метакомунікативів та виокремлення їх основних типів. Проаналізовано зазначені метакомунікативи на рівні інтратекстуальної реальності та простежено їхнє функціонування...

GEORGE ORWELL’S FAIRY STORY “ANIMAL FARM” IN UKRAINIAN VARIATIONS IN TERMS OF RETRANSLATION HYPOTHESIS

The article highlights the specifics of the dystopian novella “Animal Farm” by George Orwell from the perspective of the retranslation hypothesis developed by a French theorist of translation Antoine Berman. George Orwel...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP521752
  • DOI -
  • Views 143
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

О. М. Демська (2018). Language and Modernity. Науковий вісник Дрогобицького державного педагогічного університету імені Івана Франка. Серія: Філологічні науки (мовознавство), 10(), 29-31. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-521752