Measuring Social Value Orientation

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many social scientists for decades and several different measurement methods have been developed so far. Here we introduce a new measure of SVO that has several advantages over existent methods. A detailed description of the new measurement method is presented, along with norming data that provide evidence of its solid psychometric properties. We conclude with a brief discussion of the research streams that would benefit from a more sensitive and higher resolution measure of SVO, and extend an invitation to others to use this new measure which is freely available.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf

Keywords

Related Articles

A re-examination of the effect of contextual group size on people’s attitude to risk

Using Kahneman and Tversky’s life-death decision paradigm, Wang and colleagues (e.g., Wang & Johnston, 1995; Wang, 1996a, 1996b, 1996c, 2008; Wang et al., 2001) have shown two characteristic phenomena regarding people’s...

A novel approach to studying strategic decisions with eye-tracking and machine learning

We propose a novel method of using eye-tracking to study strategic decisions. The conventional approach is to hypothesize what eye-patterns should be observed if a given model of decision-making was accurate, and then pr...

Interpersonal effects of expressed anger and sorrow in morally charged negotiation

The expression of emotion can play a significant role in strategic decision-making. In this study, we hypothesized that emotion expression alters behavior in morally charged negotiation. We investigated the impact of fac...

A Bayesian latent mixture model approach to assessing performance in stock-flow reasoning

People often perform poorly on stock-flow reasoning tasks, with many (but not all) participants appearing to erroneously match the accumulation of the stock to the inflow – a response pattern attributed to the use of a “...

Prompting deliberation increases base-rate use

People often base judgments on stereotypes, even when contradictory base-rate information is provided. In a sample of 438 students from two state universities, we tested several hypotheses regarding why people would pref...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677861
  • DOI -
  • Views 196
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf (2011). Measuring Social Value Orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677861