Measuring Social Value Orientation

Journal Title: Judgment and Decision Making - Year 2011, Vol 6, Issue 8

Abstract

Narrow self-interest is often used as a simplifying assumption when studying people making decisions in social contexts. Nonetheless, people exhibit a wide range of different motivations when choosing unilaterally among interdependent outcomes. Measuring the magnitude of the concern people have for others, sometimes called Social Value Orientation (SVO), has been an interest of many social scientists for decades and several different measurement methods have been developed so far. Here we introduce a new measure of SVO that has several advantages over existent methods. A detailed description of the new measurement method is presented, along with norming data that provide evidence of its solid psychometric properties. We conclude with a brief discussion of the research streams that would benefit from a more sensitive and higher resolution measure of SVO, and extend an invitation to others to use this new measure which is freely available.

Authors and Affiliations

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf

Keywords

Related Articles

Choices and affective reactions to negative life events: An averaging/summation analysis

Three experiments investigated individuals’ preferences and affective reactions to negative life experiences. Participants had a more intense negative affective reaction when they were exposed to a highly negative life e...

Religion, group threat and sacred values

Sacred or protected values have important influences on decision making, particularly in the context of intergroup disputes. Thus far, we know little about the process of a value becoming sacred or why one person may be...

Facing expectations: Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard

We argue that people choosing prosocial distribution of goods (e.g., in dictator games) make this choice because they do not want to disappoint their partner rather than because of a direct preference for the chosen pros...

Numeracy predicts preference consistency: Deliberative search heuristics increase choice consistency for choices from description and experience

Many people exhibit inconsistent preferences when they make choices based on descriptive summaries as compared to choices based on prior experiences. Theoretically, factors that promote more deliberative and skilled deci...

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving

Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous wit...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP677861
  • DOI -
  • Views 139
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

Ryan O. Murphy, Kurt A. Ackerman and Michel J. J. Handgraaf (2011). Measuring Social Value Orientation. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(8), -. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-677861