Milk Fatty Acid Composition and Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) Content in Dairy Ewe’s Milk in Relation to the Nature of Food Supplements

Journal Title: Journal of Animal Science Advances - Year 2011, Vol 1, Issue 2

Abstract

Milk fatty acid composition was determined in Sicilo – Sarde dairy ewes supplemented with two concentrates made of varied raw materials. Twenty Sicilo-Sarde ewes were divided into two homogeneous groups (after analysis by Bartlett test of homogeneity) according to age (5.3 ± 1.25 years and 5.7 ± 1.15 years), litter size (1.1 ± 0.31), the number of lactation (4.3 ± 1.25 and 4.6 ± 0.96), and weight (33.83 ± 5.63 and 33.95 ± 5.58 kg). Ewes were housed in two identical boxes with an area of 10.14 m[sup]2[/sup] each (1.01 m[sup]2[/sup]/ewe). Both groups of ewes were offered a common base ration of oat hay (1.5 kg DM / ewe ). They were supplemented with one of two concentrates at the rate of 500 g /ewe/ day . The first concentrate (CC) was a standard concentrate made of corn, barley, wheat bran, soybean and a mineral supplement and vitamins for sheep. The second concentrate (CS) included local white sorghum, horse beans and the same mineral and vitamins supplement. Milk samples (1 sample /group of ewes/ week) during the first ten weeks of the study, were collected for analysis of total fat and fatty acids by gas chromatography. The fat content was 72.1 ± 4.1 and 75.8 ± 6 g / kg for the control group (CC) and experimental group(CS), respectively. The main fatty acid was palmitic acid C16 (27.75 ± 1.29% vs. 27.77 ± 1.21% of total fatty acids for the CS and CC diets, respectively) and miristic acid C14 (12.06 ± 0.82% and 12.47 ± 1.21% for CC and CS, respectively). Capric acid (C10) had an intermediate concentration. It was comparable (p> 0.05) in both concentrates (7.17 ± 1.17) in the control group (CC) and 7.38 ± 1.39 % in the experimental group (CS). The concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) was 0.48 ± 0.03 for the CC and 0.36 ± 0.09% for the CS ewe groups, respectively. Total fatty acids were comparable (p> 0.05) for both ewe groups.

Authors and Affiliations

H. Selmi , M. Kammoun , G. Tibaoui , B. Rekik

Keywords

Related Articles

Analysis of Buffalo Calf Management Practices followed by Buffalo Owners

Present study was conducted in Bareilly and Surguja districts of Uttar Pradesh and Chhattisgarh state to ascertain the buffalo calf management practices followed by buffalo owners and for this data were collected by 100...

Evaluation of Prepared Polyvalent Inactivated Oil Adjuvant Vaccine of P. multocida, M. haemolytica and P. trehalosi Isolated from Ostrich

Pasteurellosis is one of the most important diseases affecting ostrich. This study was planned as an attempt to throw spotlights upon the prevalence of Pasteurella species among ostrich as well as preparation of a suitab...

Alternative Splicing and Expression of Cattle Clusterin Gene in Healthy and Mastitis-Infected Mammary Tissues

The 1,369bp expressed clone sequence of clusterin (CLU) cDNA was used to evaluate transcriptional changes in the mammary tissue in Chinese Holstein Cattle. Two transcript variants (X-CLU and Y-CLU) were discovered in mas...

Assessment of Age Genetic Correlations for Weight in Pond Reared Litopenaeus Vannamei

Litopenaeus vannamei were reared in commercial ponds over two generations with full pedigree information. Weights, heritability, phenotypic and genetic correlations of animals were measured at 120, 150 and 180 days of ag...

Study on Ovine Fasciollosis in Wegdi District, North East Ethiopia

A Cross-sectional study was conducted in selected Kebele’s of Wegdi Wereda of South Wollo zone from October 2011 up to December 2011with the objective of estimating the prevalence and related risk factors of fasciolosis...

Download PDF file
  • EP ID EP113864
  • DOI -
  • Views 145
  • Downloads 0

How To Cite

H. Selmi, M. Kammoun, G. Tibaoui, B. Rekik (2011). Milk Fatty Acid Composition and Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA) Content in Dairy Ewe’s Milk in Relation to the Nature of Food Supplements. Journal of Animal Science Advances, 1(2), 89-93. https://europub.co.uk/articles/-A-113864